It is the duty of prosecutors to make sure that the right person is prosecuted for the right offence, and to bring offenders to justice. Casework decisions made fairly, impartially and with integrity help to deliver justice for victims, witnesses, defendants and the public. I’m a big fan of Sandford’s writing and in his hands this story gradually morphs from an interesting and often amusing account of Letty landing on her feet and directing traffic pretty much from the start, to something darker and more sinister. And because we can see what’s happening from the point of view of both the investigators and the criminals, we have a pretty good idea – although not in a detailed way – of what’s potentially coming down the line. The set-piece action scene, when when it arrives, is significant in size and scale, with Letty having a front row seat. By this point I was right with her and though it might be argued that the whole concoction is somewhat unlikely (actually, highly unlikely in my view) it was certainly dramatic and well told, and I was willingly dragged along with it. Technological advances mean that best evidence may be a recording of what might have been seen or heard. Evidence captured in this way can have considerable advantages in respect of interviews with suspects, significant witnesses and others. the exercise of legal powers should not be oppressive and should be proportionate to the crime under investigation

Nowadays we do not confine ourselves to the best evidence. We admit all relevant evidence. The goodness or badness of it goes only to weight and not to admissibility. Gaining the support and confidence of communities also helps to cultivate sources of intelligence for the future and reduce the fear of crime. John and Letty’s job is to head to Texas to find out about some missing oil and what’s being done with the profits. There are rumors about various militia groups, including one that is led by a mystery woman.There is an obvious reason why the film advertises the fact that it was made without MoD co-operation. While it allows the military to argue for its own rules and their enforcement, no matter how senseless or discriminatory they may appear from a contemporary civilian viewpoint, it holds no punches in drawing a harrowing picture of the methodology used in that enforcement. The work of the investigator is shown as endless witch hunts for sexual deviancy and interminable archiving of every little hint, rumour or suggestion born from "crew cut, doesn't fancy me, ergo lesbian" style logic, of grossly invasive personal searches and degrading interrogations about sexual histories and personal associations. The pitiless system reduces skilled women eager to serve their country into vile criminals and chews them up. A victim includes anyone directly affected by the actions or inactions of any public body. A victim may include an applicant who has not yet suffered the consequences of an alleged breach of the ECHR by a public authority, provided there is a real threat of their being affected by it in the future. Types of victim A little problem I have is that the NOW Letty is exceptional in every way; a Stanford grad, good-looking and fit, wears fashionable clothes and expensive jewelry (including high-end underwear), a sharpshooter (beats Delta Force guy at a shooting range), she owns a variety of firearms (the kind that made gun nuts droool) just to name a few. Nationally, the integrated offender management framework allows partner agencies to work together to ensure that offenders are managed in a coordinated way. Volume crime On the negative side, when Letty is partnered with DHS investigator, John Kaiser, she suddenly becomes Wonder Woman. Letty is 24 years old, while John is a 47-year-old ex-Army master sergeant ... yet she is the one who figures everything out, time after time. It was too unbelievable. Had she been portrayed as a savant, that would have explained her ability to look at situations and know exactly what should be done - but she wasn't. (Maybe she was in the Prey books?) I truly feel as though I would have enjoyed the book more if Letty and John had been more equal partners. I tired of the young whippersnapper knowing more than her more life-experienced partner time after time.

An investigator should strive to ‘set the scene’ for the court and jury. Accordingly, any relevant evidence about the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime should be sought as it can usually be presented to the court. Bad character Smart investigative work that occasionally crosses the line of legality drives this thriller. Lots of guns and exciting action, if you are into that sort of thing. Letty is young and a little bit of a loose canon--after all, she's a product of her crazy life experiences. I liked how she seems willing to learn from Kaiser, the seasoned ex-Army soldier, as well. There's a satisfying ending that leaves the door open just a little for future stories. Fans of Sandford's Prey series will certainly enjoy this new spinoff. Making appropriate decisions requires knowledge of some of the factors involved. A number of sources of information may assist this decision making. Information sources It has been said that the evidence against the applicants is circumstantial: so it is, but circumstantial evidence is very often the best. It is evidence of surrounding circumstances which, by undesigned coincidence, is capable of proving a proposition with the accuracy of mathematics. It is no derogation of evidence to say that it is circumstantial. Admissibility

Friends comments and ratings

effective investigators maintain a balance that recognises the concerns of all the parties involved There were a couple of plot holes, one large enough to fall into. Having to do with communication with Letty and Kaiser on the ground cut off from the other law enforcement agencies, why did law enforcement not up a drone, or high-flying surveillance aircraft. Didn’t matter for me I was in it for the ride. Bad character evidence is evidence of, or a disposition towards, misconduct rather than evidence relating to the facts in issue. Misconduct includes the commission of an offence or other ‘reprehensible behaviour’.

An investigation conducted by police officers with a view to it being ascertained whether a person should be charged with an offence, or whether a person charged with an offence is guilty of it. Letty's spin-off from the Lucas Davenport series reminds me of how Renee Ballard is Harry Bosch. The authors created a new series with a female lead a carbon copy of their successful male characters. I would love this more if Letty's perfection is more understated. Despite my mini-rant, I'm still all-in for the next one!

Letty was introduced as a character in the Prey novels almost 20 years ago, and I’ve often suspected that Sandford would someday do a book or series with her in the lead. (In reality, Letty would be in her 30s by now, but Sandford characters exist in a slowed down version of reality.) She’s been a big part of several of the books, often driving her adopted father crazy by her stubborn insistence on doing things her way, but also saving the day a couple of times. Despite the Prey books having one successful spin-off series with the Virgil Flower novels, I was always a little uneasy about how Letty seemed destined to be the hero of a Sandford thriller someday. I’m not sure why, it just seemed like nepotism even if these are all fictional characters. The Investigator is the story of the former British Army sergeant Caroline Meagher. She joined a military police unit tasked with hunting down and exposing lesbian women within the ranks, as the Army still barred sexual minorities from serving in the 1980s (and still did when the film was made). Only she later found out that she was lesbian herself. The film dramatises her double life in and eventual dismissal from the Army. This evidence can be defined as evidence of the circumstances surrounding the offence, or an event from which a ‘fact in issue’ may be inferred. This form of evidence is especially relevant in situations when crimes are committed and there are no witnesses present. Common examples of situations when circumstantial evidence would be relevant are: