Sandra Lean told numerous lies about many cases and individual’s and the ‘internet “hate campaign” she mentioned was her own aimed at other people, in which she attempted to discredit many people, especially those who saw through her and her former boyfriend and co-director un-convicted baby killer, sexual deviant, con-artist and abuser Billy Middleton.

A long walk to justice | 12 | Archives and the truth and

The police, because they didn’t’ find vaginal trauma or wounds which would suggest rape, couldn’t make up their minds if sex had been a motivating factor or not. Alice Walker, a woman who had impeded the police investigation from the very beginning, came out and condemned that polygraph test saying, “it doesn’t prove anything, he is a lying cheating murderer.” My fertile mind is beginning to wonder if Findlay was in league with the opposition. I’m not joking, this isn’t funny, a young man got life in prison on nonsense evidence like this. When criminologist, Dr Sandra Lean, started to ask questions about the case as early as 2004, she was spat on in the street, received threats of violence, had bullying men turn up at her home making threats on her life, and all was accepted and permitted by Dalkeith Police. Complaining about all “manners of slurs, vitriol and downright rudeness slung her way,” you could be forgiven for thinking she was describing exactly what she had done to Luke Mitchell and his mother from 2003-2021.When he was later questioned, he mentioned a distinctive hair clasp which was not readily visible on Jodi’s body and his description of her clothing implied he had seen her much later than just at school as he had claimed. Nevertheless, Ms Hamilton absolves herself of any wrongdoing, asking the question; “what heinous crime have you committed this time, Hamilton?.” The heinous crime of stitching up a child and putting him in jail for a murder he didn’t commit comes to mind. I heard criticism that Luke Mitchell had in some way “conned the test” because he took it while his eyes were closed as he answered the questions. Shotts’ prison agent rooms, where the test was conducted, have glass partitions which people can look through while you’re visiting. The last time I had a visit with Luke Mitchell in 2010, the late Martin Hamilton, a Glasgow gangster, was in the next booth and kept looking into where we were meeting. This was very off-putting. When Luke Mitchell took the polygraph test, prison officers were looking in and trying to distract him, so Terry Mullins advised him to close his eyes. When he was later questioned, he mentioned she had a distinctive hair clasp which was not readily visible on Jodi’s body and his description of her clothing implied he had seen her much later than just at school as he had claimed. SCOTT FORBES:

Law Society of Scotland The Scottish Legal Walks are back! | Law Society of Scotland

As I’ve said, I’m absolutely convinced, there’s no two ways about it. The three witnesses (besides Luke) who gave their on the spot original statements to the police were telling the truth…the dog led Luke to the V in the wall. The bottom line is… Mia led Luke to that V in the wall. Mia didn’t even need anything of Jodi’s to sniff. This type of scenario, if it was true, would explain why “numerous semen deposits” were found on Jodi’s body and clothes. Stephen Kelly’s sperm was found on Jodi’s T-shirt. In any other murder case, he would have been a prime suspect as a result. Instead, the police handed him an explanation as to how this semen was found on Jodi’s T-shirt.However, following the trial Kareen's solicitor did take a statement from her counsellor. That is why Billy never fought to see the kids. His lies would be exposed before his family and he couldn't let that happen. For a reporter to dismiss a used condom filled with semen found at a murder scene to cover up the police ineptitude is appalling. Andrina Bryson was not an independent witness. She and her family were friends with the Jones and Walker families. She claimed she did not know the Jones family.