Now, Thomas Cowan has released a new book similar to this book. The new book is called, “Contagion Myth”. I’ve read the book twice and it seems to contradict his formerly mentioned title. His previous books used virus theory to prove a point, and this new book does everything it can to convince the reader that virus theory is wrong. They say Paracelsus’ idea that the dose makes the poison was wrong. Since we know that very tiny amounts of hormones produce effects in the human body, they assume that infinitesimal amounts of any substance must have toxic effects, and when people are exposed to multiple natural toxins and manmade products, the effects must add up. They are chemophobes, assuming that every chemical is a poison to be avoided. They believe Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is a real disease.

LESTER, D. & Parker D. – What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong The failure of the ‘germ theory’ to explain these diseases does not mean that they cannot be explained, but it should be emphasised that ‘asymptomatic infections’ are not synonymous with disease. A person without symptoms is not someone who is ill with a disease. Instead, the world is suffering from a pandemic of misinformation, deception and outright lies that have been and continue to be promulgated on a daily basis by the mainstream media; the symptoms of this real pandemic also include blind obedience to ‘authority’ and belief in the words of so-called ‘experts’. https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-Misinterpretation-of-Antibodies-English-translation.pdf But for some incomprehensible reason, this ‘incompatibility’ does not relate to the first baby, but only to subsequent babies.There were genuine concerns about the vaccines being raised by people within the ‘alternative’ media, mainly on the basis that vaccines are known to be harmful. There were also many other claims, one of which was that these new vaccines did not contain ‘the virus’, but instead, only contained genetic material specific to the ‘virus’, which meant that these shots were not vaccines in the usual understanding of the term. As a result, many people refer to these shots as ‘gene therapy’; others have said that they are not to be considered as any form of ‘therapy’. The implications of this revelation are profound, as they undermine some of the fundamental practices of most modern healthcare systems, not least of which involve the use of medicines and vaccines in the treatment and prevention of human disease. It is for this reason that the above quote by Voltaire cannot be so easily dismissed as irrelevant. In contrast, there are other people who completely reject the prognosis and defy their doctor’s belief by not succumbing to the ‘disease’ and by living a long and healthy life. This can also be applied to the belief that ‘disease’ can be sexually transmitted, which, as shown in this article, is not based on scientific evidence. In other words, there is no such thing as a sexually-transmitted disease. This book will take you through the history of 'Germ Theory' and how we reached the understanding we currently have. After laying the foundation for why the medical establishment believes this, the authors do a great job of showing you why it's erroneous. They do not cause disease — they help us eliminate the toxic materials that could clog and slowly destroy us.”

It is now known that after organ or blood stem cell transplants, both a ‘conversion’ from ‘rhesus-negative’ to ‘rhesus-positive’ as well as a blood group change with all associated characteristics can take place.” The results of their investigation are revealed within their book, and we explore those results on today's show. It is, however, more correct to refer to these proteins simply as globulins rather than ‘immunoglobulins’, because the latter suggests they play a role in immunity but, as discussed above, this is not the case. The problems with the ideas about ‘germs’ and the true nature of what is called ‘disease’ are explained in detail in our book.The COVID ‘vaccines’ currently in use are not all produced in the same way. However, the main focus of attention has been on mRNA ‘vaccines’ that are claimed to contain genetically engineered mRNA, which, when injected into the body, will instruct cells to make the ‘spike protein’ of the virus. According to the vaccine manufacturers, this will cause the body to manufacture antibodies against the spike protein and protect people from any future ‘infections’ of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. A popular saying, which is often attributed to Albert Einstein, claims that problems cannot be solved by using the same way of thinking that created them. The concept underlying this saying can be extrapolated to indicate that a problem can often be better understood by people outside of the discipline in which it occurs because they are not bound by any dogma or biases inherent within that discipline. The situation worsened after December 2020 when COVID-19 vaccination programmes started to be implemented around the world. Unsurprisingly, these programmes were supported and promoted by the MSM as the ‘solution’ to COVID.

The authors argue that the conventional approach adopted by most healthcare systems entails the use of “medicine” to treat human disease. The idea, encapsulated by the above quote attributed to Voltaire, the nom de plume of François-Marie Arouet (1694-1778), will no doubt be regarded by most people as inapplicable to 21st-century healthcare, especially the system known as modern medicine. The reason that people would consider this idea to no longer be relevant is likely to be based on the assumption that “medical science” has made significant advances since the 18th century and that 21st-century doctors, therefore, possess a thorough—if not quite complete—knowledge of medicines, diseases, and the human body. Unfortunately, however, this would be a mistaken assumption—as this book will demonstrate. Certain things should be remembered while interpreting the test results. Having a high titer value does not always indicate an infection; similarly, having a low titer value is not necessarily associated with a low-grade infection or no infection.” This explanation exposes the fundamental error in conducting laboratory research without an adequate understanding of the living organism that is the human body, as they further state, Studied trees alive during that period; tree rings confirmed the presence of high levels of toxic chemicals like ammonia Large discrepancy in the number of reported deaths (official figures range from 10 million to a hundred million)

In an article entitled Misinterpretation of antibodies, originally published in German, Stefan Lanka PhD is quoted as stating that, It is clear that evidence to support the ‘germ theory’ remained conspicuous by its absence many decades after it had been proposed by Louis Pasteur. However, the situation has not been rectified; the germ theory of disease remains unproven with overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that it also remains a fallacy. It should be clear that, far from being the body’s army of fighters, the proteins the medical establishment incorrectly calls ‘antibodies’ are an essential part of the body’s healing mechanisms. It is important to recognise that attaining health does not require efforts to ‘fight disease’, because, as we explain in detail in our book, there are no ‘diseases’, there are only symptoms that represent the body’s efforts to expel toxins and heal itself. The attainment of health therefore requires efforts to support the body’s natural self-healing processes, which includes minimising or, where possible, avoiding exposures to toxic substances.

Another important question must be raised: even when a supposed virus does kill cells in a test-tube (in vitro) … can we safely conclude that these findings can be carried over to a living organism (in vivo)?” I believe any rational person would agree with Cowan’s suggestion to ‘weed out’ other possibilities before we say it’s a virus that we can’t even locate, isolate, and purify. Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, in human beings of whom they know nothing.” Voltaire They say neutrons have positive and negative charges which balance each other. Wrong! Neutrons have no charge.On the basis that the condition is claimed to be caused by a bacterium, the recommended treatment involves antibiotics, which, according to the Mayo Clinic, include injected ceftriaxone or oral azithromycin. In common with all antibiotics, these ‘treatments’ are associated with ‘side effects’, a term that merely refers to unintended effects, but they are clearly direct effects as they would not have occurred if the patient had not taken them.