Problem with the Answer:All of these conditions rely either on abnormal fusion of the cranial sutures (craniosynostosis), or microcephaly (small skull), neither of which are present in the Starchild Skull, as proven by CT Scans and visual examination of the Skull. Dr. Robinson and some of his colleagues are on the record stating that the sutures, the lines where the bones of the skull meet like puzzle pieces, were unfused and healthy at the time of death, reference Dr. Robinson's 2004 report The initial report of the Starchild anomalies given to the staff of The Field Reports was extensive. What remained a central point in our examinations were two factors: Expert Analysis of the physical structure of the bone, which identified the bone as much thinner and lighter than normal human bone, but also discovered that it is much stronger than human bone, a feature possibly related to the fibers in the bone

Alien skull' star attraction at Leeds extra-terrestrial conference". Yorkshire Evening Post. 27 June 2009 . Retrieved 13 August 2011. Skeptic's Answer:Lots of conditions can cause this, including Aperts, Crouzons, and Dubowitz syndrome. https://thefieldreportscom.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/why-i-chose-to-investigate-the-starchild-skull-an-interview-with-chase-kloetzke/ Pye claimed to have obtained the skull from Ray and Melanie Young of El Paso, Texas, in February 1999, stating that the skull was found around 1930 in a mine tunnel about 100 miles (160km) southwest of Chihuahua, Mexico, buried alongside a normal human skeleton that was exposed and lying face up on the surface of the tunnel. [1] [2]Castriota-Scanderbeg, A., Dallapiccola, B. Abnormal Skeletal Phenotypes. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005. 3-100, 501-931. Artists depiction of how the child would have looked, after analysis of the Starchild Skull. (tonio48 / Deviant Art ) DNA Testing of the Starchild Skull The scientists running the Starchild Project knew that the only definitive way of proving that the skull was not human was through DNA testing. So they waited nearly a decade while the technology for recovering and sequencing ancient DNA, such as the 900-year-old Starchild's, could be perfected.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of the claim that the Starchild Skull, a 900-year-old anomalously shaped skull, belonged to an alien-hybrid being. The first phase of the project was to procure an exact replica and secure legal rights to continue with physical testing of the original. Then, the skull was compared with other human and animal skulls and most closely resembled that of a 5 year down syndrome child. When exact measurements were taken to compare to that of a typical skull of around 5 years old, the most notable discrepancy was its increased cranial capacity. A study of the teeth confirmed the skull belonged to a child about 5 years of age. The final phase involved extracting DNA from the inside of the skull and a tooth. The mitochondrial DNA tests showed that the child was a male and his mother was a Native American from the haplogroup C1. The paternal DNA test revealed the father was Native American haplogroup Q. The Starchild Skull was confirmed to be 100% human. The Starchild Skull – photo credit: Lindsey Hughes INTRODUCTION Though the rear of the Starchild Skull is widely expanded and greatly flattened, this is not the result of deliberate binding or cradleboarding. This was verified in 2004 br Dr Ted Robinson and his team. Problem with the Answer:It is flattened at an angle so steep that would tilt a child's chin down into its chest so far it would suffocate. Dr. Robinson also noted that there were none of the tell-tale signs of artificial flattening. Reference Cradleboarding, Dr. Robinson's Report The facts are not open to interpretation unless they want to rewrite the rules of genetics. There is no analysis available by which they can take the data they have provided me, or on the web, to make the claims they do about FoxP2. I can only guess at the reasons they want to keep up such an obviously incorrect claim…DNA tests have shown it is human (and both parents were human) suffering probably from congenital hydrocephalus.” – Gary NolanAt Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exist countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained. The teeth of the Skull are a controversial subject, as many experts feel they show the Starchild was a child of about 5 years old, however the biting surfaces of the teeth are worn and ground to a degree that seems impossible for such a young child, especially one with smaller than normal chewing muscles Concluding the investigation and compiling the entirety of the scientific data from the many scientists involved, we can safely say that the Starchild Skull is not alien, nor a hybrid of a human and alien. He was 100% a human male child with profound deformities. When we began the investigation, we had no expectations besides completing testing and examinations by credentialed scientists to the extent that modern science and technology could take us. We were not working from speculation or relying on any research done in the past besides the carbon dating. We were not hoping for the Starchild Skull to be human or alien, even though that discovery (although unprovable at this time without comparable DNA) would have been groundbreaking. We were searching only for the truth. Additional Theories for Abnormalities

low placed ears – http://www.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/pinna-abnormalities-and-low-set-ears/overview.html Starchild περιείχε συνολικά 56 παραλλαγές!Γιανακατανοήσουμετησημασία, σεένανπίθηκο rhesus μόνο 2 απότα 211 ζεύγηβάσεωντουθαπεριείχανπαραλλαγήαπότονάνθρωπο.Ανήτανποντίκι, θαήταν 20. Ανήτανσκύλος, 27. mt-DNA results can also be found here – https://thefieldreportscom.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/mt-dna-paleo-dna-labs-report.pdf At our last meeting, in Sept 2013, Lloyd explained to me that Matthew Brownstein, following his own research, proposed that they form an agreement and a company as a vehicle for furthering the goals of the Starchild Project. Although Lloyd didn’t go into minute detail about the agreement, he did tell me of the formation of an agreement between himself, Amy (his ex-wife), Ray and Melanie Young and Matthew Brownstein. The reasons I am explaining this will become clear below.Problem with the Answer:It didn't have any of these conditions as proven by X-Rays and CT scans, andthe Starchild Skull is not a fossil. (Fossils are over 10,000 years old, the Starchild Skull is only 900 years old, reference the C14 dating report Problem with the Answer:Fluid inside the brain causes pressure that would have pushed the weakest points, the suture lines where the plates of the skull join, outwards, and this did not happen. There is no evidence of internal pressure, reference Dr. Robinson's Report HuffPost, σεέναάρθροτου 2013 γιατον Lloyd Pye καιτοέργοτουπουσχετίζεταιμετο Starchild Skull, «δενχρειάζονταιπολλάακόμαγιαναπάρουμεθέσηγιατηνύπαρξηεξωγήινων».Παρ’όλααυτά, ηεπίσημηεπιστήμησυνεχίζειναυποστηρίζειότιτοκρανίοανήκεισεέναείδοςανθρώπινουπαιδιούμεκάποιοείδοςυδροκεφαλία, παραποιώνταςταεξωγήιναεπιχειρήματα, ωςψευδοεπιστήμη… The first ancient DNA test was undertaken four years later, in 2003. It recovered human mitochondrial DNA but no nuclear DNA. This suggested a human mother and non-human father, leading to conjecture about the Starchild being a human-alien hybrid or, more likely, an unknown species with some genetic similarities to humans. Incidentally, the female human skull discovered with the Starchild Skull was found to be genetically unrelated to the Starchild, ruling out speculation that the female was the Starchild’s mother. Mason County, Virginia, 1821: Seven skulls found, so large they could easily fit over a man's head; with double rows of teeth on the upper jaw, and but two solitary teeth on the lower jaw.

I have to say I am really impressed and have a lot of respect for the owner, Melanie Young to do the hard thing and change the direction and motives of the investigation when it became obvious that it was being done for other motives, The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe. https://thefieldreportscom.wordpress.com/2017/03/28/the-16-things-you-thought-you-knew-about-the-starchild-skull-and-what-science-says-about-them-may-surprise-you/ Medina County, Ohio, 1881. Nine skeletons found while digging the cellar of a house, all with double teeth. The skulls were so large one man was able to put one on like a hat, and it rested upon his shoulders. The Starchild teeth prove the skull is much older and has 3 rows of teeth. There is no verifiable report and the name of the expert that made this claim of “adult teeth” or 3 rows of teeth has been withheld. When the x-rays and photographs were examined, the claims proved to have no merit. James Gilliam, DDS. of Noble, Oklahoma, was given the photos and x-rays to examine. He concluded that teeth and tooth buds, were what you expect to find on a young child, approximately 5 years old. The “tooth buds” are forming as the child reaches the age to lose the baby teeth. Adult teeth do not form completely until they are ready to be exposed. This is what causes the loosening of the baby teeth. No professional on the record has claimed there are 3 rows of teeth. The one “tooth” that survived in the small piece of the maxilla has caused the only controversy in the actual age of the Starchild as one un-named “expert” concluded the wear on the tooth was more of adult status. Unfortunately, we cannot verify this proclamation. All experts and testing since have concluded the disposition as approximate age of 5.

Sign up to our free newsletters

The Starchild Skull was first discovered in Mexico. ( Fair use ) Initial Research into the Starchild Skull