Consumer demand: A connected world means that consumers want seamless connectivity across their entire lives. The lines between work, home, and leisure are increasingly blurry, and consumers who still need vehicles to get from point A to point B will want all of those pieces of their lives to be integrated — even behind the wheel. ASPICE goes hand in hand with many existing safety and quality management best practices. In fact, achieving ASPICE Capability Level 2 is typical for completing an ISO 26262 functional safety audit. ASPICE also exemplifies Lean manufacturing principles by fostering an iterative design environment, shortening system to function successfully, we take into account how different driving conditions, such as rain or poor lighting, will affect performance. After determining the functional requirements for each scenario, we map a work process for the project

In introducing and implementing Automotive SPICE ®, it is important to develop solutions in keeping with any specific circumstances that may affect a project or the situation faced by the company as a whole. This specialist manual equips you with an understanding of how to use the standard to solve a specific task. Used as an interpretation guide, it enables you to improve procedures effectively in keeping with Automotive SPICE ® standards. Agile SPICE ™ doesn’t favour one specific agile practice, like scrum or kanban. Its objective is to bridge existing PAM processes and outcomes and retain existing process attributes or generic practices on CL1-3.

Kreiner, C.J., et al.: Integrating functional safety, automotive SPICE and six sigma – the AQUA knowledge base and integration examples. In: Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement 21st European Conference, EuroSPI, pp. 285–295 (2014) Macher, G., Diwold, K., Veledar, O., Armengaud, E., Römer, K.: The quest for infrastructures and engineering methods enabling highly dynamic. Autonomous Systems European Conference on Software Process Improvement, pp. 15–27 (2019) One of the key goals of ASPICE is to improve software development processes in the auto industry within a structured approach to software development, ensuring that all necessary steps and activities are carried out in a systematic and controlled manner. ASPICE also helps automotive developers to assess suppliers in the value chain with a framework to evaluate supplier capabilities and competencies so that they can meet industry requirements. Developers can then make informed decisions about which suppliers to work with and ensure that the products they receive are of the highest quality. Navigating Automotive SPICE® PAM 3.1: Navigating and understanding the Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM) 3.1 – know where to find vital information and how to interpret it.

ASPICE helps automotive suppliers incorporate best practices to identify defects earlier in development and ensure that OEM requirements are met.It also provides you with uniform assessment benchmarks. The structure of the manual corresponds to the structure of the standard. As the standard became focused more toward automotive, the moniker “Automotive SPICE” or “ASPICE” took hold. As it stands now, ASPICE is a process assessment model and a process reference model for software development in the automotive industry. Software teams who design and develop software for the automotive industry should use ASPICE to document processes and measure the maturity of the organization’s processes. The thorough requirement analysis guides software development and helps provide engineers with the guideposts

Reduce costs and improve time to market: Because ASPICE is more concerned with process than with specific regulations or safety guidelines, using the standard can help teams reduce costs and improve efficiency, thereby improving overall market competitiveness. How to Ensure Compliance with ASPICE

What is Automotive SPICE (ASPICE)?

ASPICE is focused on the engineering practices according to the V-model at a project level- not only software engineering, but also systems engineering (software + hardware, electronics, mechanical, etc.). CMMI is oriented towards project management and other organisational practices at a company level.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) provides essential assets which help engineering teams achieve their selected assessment level of the ASPICE standard. ELM functions neatly overlay the different ASPICE process groups as outlined below. IBM ELM solution elements aligned with ASPICE process groups. The final product is only as good as its components Messnarz, R., Ekert, D., Zehetner, T., Aschbacher, L.: Experiences with ASPICE 3.1 and the VDA automotive SPICE guidelines – using advanced assessment systems. In: Walker, A., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2019. CCIS, vol. 1060, pp. 549–562. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_42 ASPICE started as a variation of the ISO/IEC 15504, or SPICE, standard. SPICE stands for “Software Process Improvement and Capability determination.” The SPICE standard began as a way to provide a framework for independent assessors to evaluate an organization’s capability for software development. an independent, nonprofit company established by the ISO board. To earn a Competent Assessor certificate, the employee must have completed at least 250 hours as a provisional assessor. IBM wanted to help make achieving compliance easier, so we introduced a simple way to leverage the capabilities of ELM when implementing varied industry standards across your development lifecycle with the Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Automotive Compliance solution, an integrated portfolio of engineering management capabilities, to help automotive companies create products more efficiently.If you plan to go through the ASPICE certification process, our experts can provide your team with ASPICE training for any role and at any level. We can also conduct an audit and a gap analysis to identify areas for improvement and help you implement the necessary changes. Wooden panels and beltless bench seating have gone the way of the dinosaurs, and vehicles have become increasingly sophisticated with every passing year. A major part of that? Embedded systems and automotive software. So why have functional safety requirements become more standardized while automotive software standards remain touch and go? Armengaud, E., Frager, S., Jones, S., Massoner, A., Parrilla, A.F., Wikström, N., Macher, G.: Development Framework for Longitudinal Automated Driving Functions with Off-board Information Integration arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10009 (2019) ISO - International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262 Road vehicles Functional Safety Part 1–10 (2011)