Dead zones can be set in the Windows game controller panel for each axis, or in Elite Dangerous input bindings. X52Pro profiles aren't fully compatible with X52, but the mapping proposed gave me good ideas about multiple command binding Combatible with Most Flight Simulation, Combat Simulation, and Space Simulation Software including: Before you start up your flight simulator for the first time, you should acquaint yourself with some of the controls and features of the X52 Professional H.O.T.A.S. Go to Control Panel> Game Controllers and select the Properties for your X52 Professional H.O.T.A.S. You can test your buttons and axes here, and adjust the time readout and LED brightness and color. No problem, glad it can help. Not sure if you can open the profile or not, here is a run down of what is in there just in case, anything not set in the below is set within the game binds file.

Files - Digital Combat Simulator World User Files - Digital Combat Simulator World

Wolf wrote:Great work! You don't happen to have the PDFs for the X-55, too? I've been using jgm's Saitek X-55 Bindings Reference Sheet generator. It is really great and all, but produces JPEGs and no PDFs. Mode Switch has been cleared of its functionality and is only used to select "DOGFIGHT / CENTER / MISSILE OVERRIDE" mode. I have been looking for a really good X52 profile for F-14B and I never see one so I have this one I know you will enjoy! Excellent, got my x52 pro yesterday and have it setup on the default ingame bindings wuth a few tweaks and additions on the KB The unit looks impressive, one of their nicer-appearing units - however the "custom lighting" is one color for everything and if it's out of a palette of 16 million colors then I'm an alien. For the price, it should have had independent lighting on every switch, button and knob.Well built, solid feel. Responsive controls for serious gaming, tight and accurate, very little to no "slop". Almost enough buttons for a TRUE HOTAS experience in Elite:Dangerous, no doubt plenty for most games. Software is robust and stable. Soooo many buttons, each switch on the base of the throttle is a toggle; essentially doubling the amount of switches that you have I only got this 2 weeks ago and since then I have had to reinstalled the software 2 times to get the programming to work.

X52 Pro worth it? | Frontier Forums X52 Pro worth it? | Frontier Forums

an "Editable" PDF file, so if you don't use my profile you can still use the PDF file - note I didn't created the initial pdf template, but it's very useful anyway. Great work! You don't happen to have the PDFs for the X-55, too? I've been using jgm's Saitek X-55 Bindings Reference Sheet generator. It is really great and all, but produces JPEGs and no PDFs. If you are willing to take the time, it is very customizable and gives you lots of options. Despite what I had read, it had a decent weight and I find it actually works better without the suction cups attached to the bottom.

Smooth, and precise control, feels like you got your money's worth. Lots, and lots of customization with the software. Lots of buttons and hats to keep me keyboard-free in Elite. I've hunted high and low over past 4-6 weeks for profile settings and changed other users profiles to come up with something I like. I only recently bought by X52 PRO a couple of months ago. There is no need to set up a dead zone on my twist yaw. It centers and actually allows for some damn fine subtle control. I'm sure those experiencing the problem are legit, but its definitely not a design flaw in every unit. For starters the throttle is so lubricated on the inside that if it sits for a while, it becomes so gummed up that it becomes difficult to move it at all, regardless of the resistance setting on the side.