By the 1790s, Gall began to study the localization of mental functions in the brain, believing that certain areas were responsible for psychological activity. Gall further believed that the shape of the skull reflected personality traits and mental abilities that corresponded to the topography of the brain. He called this "science of the head" craniology and, later, after believing the brain to be not one organ but a group of organs, changed the name of his study to organology. Ultimately, criminal phrenology would serve as the foundation for the development of the positivist biological school of criminology. One of the 18th century’s lines of thought that preceded phrenology was the “search for the sensorium commune” (Greenblatt, 1995). Phrenology was one of the earliest biological theories of crime and laid the foundation for the development of the biological school of criminology (Morin, 2014). Around the time of Cuvier’s report, the claim of a link between skull size and intelligence was becoming commonplace. This increasingly frequent supposition of 19th century naturalists, inherited from long association in Western thought, traces to at least Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and was bolstered by phrenology. 12 Phrenology was a pseudo-science founded by German physician Franz Joseph Gall (1758-1828) in the late 18th century, and then continued and popularized by Johann Spurzheim (1776-1832) and George Combe (1788-1858). Phrenology aimed to determine character and intelligence from the shape and size of the brain, as reflected through the exterior cranial surface. 13 The principles of phrenology were given an air of obviousness by cases of small-brained “idiots” reported from hospitals and asylums, and large-headed “geniuses,” documented by plaster casts, paintings, and sustained phrenological observation. 14 Phrenology was used both to advance claims of racial equality as well as racial hierarchy. Nonetheless, phrenology’s popularity through the mid-19 th century in Europe and the United States helped to entrench the notion that there were stark racial differences. 15

For the music album by the Roots, see Phrenology (album). Phrenological skull, European, 19th century. Wellcome Collection, London This article is part of a series on Simpson, D. (2005). Phrenology and the neurosciences: contributions of FJ Gall and JG Spurzhei m. ANZ journal of surgery, 75(6), 475-482. Contemporary experiments on pigeons showed that the loss of parts of the brain either caused no loss of function or the loss of a completely different function than what would have been predicted by phrenology (Flourens, 1846).During the 1930s, Belgian colonial authorities in Rwanda used phrenology to explain the purported superiority of Tutsis over Hutus. [49] Application [ edit ] 1848 edition of American Phrenological Journal published by Fowlers & Wells, New York Racism [ edit ] While still not a fringe movement, there was not popular widespread support of phrenology in France. This was not only due to strong opposition to phrenology by French scholars but also once again accusations of promoting atheism, materialism and radical religious views. Politics in France also played a role in preventing rapid spread of phrenology. [71] In Britain phrenology had provided another tool to be used for situating demographic changes; the difference was there was less fear of revolutionary upheaval in Britain compared with France. Given that most French supporters of phrenology were liberal, left-wing or socialist, it was an objective of the social elite of France, who held a restrained vision of social change, that phrenology remain on the fringes. Another objection was that phrenology seemed to provide a built in excuse for criminal behaviour, since in its original form it was essentially deterministic in nature. [71] Ireland [ edit ] In 1800, Gall teamed up with Johann Christoph Spurzheim to further research this theory. The two worked together for a dozen years before having a falling out. Spurzheim became intrigued with the psychosocial potential of this new science, believing it could empower people to improve themselves. He renamed the practice "phrenology," defined it as "the science of the mind," and set out on a lecture tour to preach the wondrous new concept throughout Britain. It caught on like wildfire, igniting interest in Scottish lawyer George Combe, who in 1820 would establish the Edinburgh Phrenological Society, the first and foremost phrenology group in Great Britain.

Instead, their “individual history and characters should be inquired into”, and only the redeemable sent. And, of course, the best way to achieve this was by using phrenology, which would be “an engine of unlimited power” in shaping the reform of criminals. With this most phrenologists concurred: however underdeveloped a mental organ was, the criminal still possessed the ability to make a moral decision. Phrenology is today recognized as pseudoscience. [1] [2] [7] The methodological rigor of phrenology was doubtful even for the standards of its time, since many authors already regarded phrenology as pseudoscience in the 19th century. [8] There have been various studies conducted that discredited phrenology, most of which were done with ablation techniques. Marie-Jean-Pierre Flourens demonstrated through ablation that the cerebrum and cerebellum accomplish different functions. He found that the impacted areas never carried out the functions that were proposed through the pseudoscience, phrenology. However, Paul Broca disproved the idea that phrenology was a science when he discovered and named the " Broca's area". The patient's ability to produce language was lost while their ability to understand language remained intact. Through an autopsy examining their brains, he found that there was damage to the left frontal lobe. He concluded that this area of the brain was responsible for language production. Between Flourens and Broca, the claims to support phrenology were dismantled. Phrenological thinking was influential in the psychiatry and psychology of the 19th century. Gall's assumption that character, thoughts, and emotions are located in specific areas of the brain is considered an important historical advance toward neuropsychology. [9] [10] He contributed to the idea that the brain is spatially organized, but not in the way he proposed. There is a clear division of labor in the brain but none of which even remotely correlates to the size of the head or the structure of the skull. While it contributed to some advancements in understanding the brain and its functions, skepticism of phrenology developed over time.

Article contents

Sysling, Fenneke (June 2018). "Science and self-assessment: phrenological charts 1840–1940". The British Journal for the History of Science. 51 (2): 261–280. doi: 10.1017/S0007087418000055. ISSN 0007-0874. PMID 29576034. It was for this reason that Lombroso made tattoos a dominant symptom of the pathological criminal (the striking illustrations in L’Uomo Delinquente are an abundant resource for the historian A phrenological head, developed by the American brothers Lorenzo and Orson Fowler, assisted in the reading of a subject's skull. A case of small heads made in 1831 by William Bally of Dublin, Ireland, illustrated the theories of phrenology. SSPL/Getty Images a b Hughes, Virginia (2013-03-13). "From Neanderthal Skull to Neanderthal Brain?". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03 . Retrieved 2021-03-30. But although phrenology may seem harmless, it was also seized upon by pro-slavery advocates who argued that it supported white supremacy. The Dark Side Of Phrenology