Using the 23mm F2 WR along side the 35mm F2 WR felt very natural. The lenses work very well together and, with both using the same 43mm filter size, I definitely appreciated the ease of switching filters between the two, without having to mess around with step-down rings. The bayonet style fitting of the 23mm F2 WR lens hood feels a little more substantive than the screw-in hood of the 35mm F2 WR, but both are a little plasticy and it would have been nice to see a little more effort when compared to the quality build of the lenses themselves. However, the f1.4, with its maximum aperture, provides slightly sharper images than the f2. So for photographers who are shooting more granular images or need more details, the Fujifilm 23mm f1.4 is better. For the average street photographer, the difference is minuscule and not quite worth the much higher cost of the f1.4 lens. Price Range

Indeed as you approach the closest focusing distance of the XF 23mm f2 it becomes softer, just like the lens on the X100 series – despite having different optical designs, they share this characteristic, making them less attractive to product and food photographers than other options in the range. However, it’s a little shorter than the f2, so it juts out slightly less from the camera. This also means that the f2 can make specific cameras top-heavy, whereas the Fujifilm f1.4 is less likely to cause any top-heaviness. Image Quality Shooting in amongst the guests in lower light is still fine of course, its only really when I needed to ensure the fast shutter speed that it mattered. Great images and an exciting story Philipp. I too have the X-T3 but tend to use the 23mm f1.4. Just got an X100V which seems extremely good too, perhaps that camera interests you too? Below is a breakdown of the 23mm f2 features and an explanation of how each one makes this lens the gem that it is and why I love it. Fuji 23mm f2 Review – Sturdy Handling / Built QualityWhen the Fujifilm XF 23mm F/2 is attached to any Fujifilm X Series body, it feels like a perfect match. This size and weight balance well, since most Fujifilm X Series camera bodies are more compact than a lot of brands, even in the mirrorless market.

I was taking pictures more carefully. My snapshots turned into more composed shots. Still, I was not focussing on a specific genre of photography. I really liked that camera, but within 5 years I had autofocus problems three times. So I thought it was time to get a new camera. I decided to buy a Fuji X-T3 with the 23mm F2 lens, which I never regretted a second yet. I totally hear you, and I genuinely wasn't expecting the F2 version to really be good enough to justify the switch for anyone already owning the F1.4 version, but after using the lens pretty extensively I can tell you it really is VERY good. The closer focusing distance of the XF 23mm f2, above left, has allowed it to more than make up for the slower aperture in terms of bokeh-blob size – now it’s the newer model that’s delivering the larger blobs, despite having a focal ratio one stop slower. The larger blobs have however accentuated the unusual shape of the blobs on the XF 23mm f2 – once again there’s no right or wrong, but the older XF 23mm f1.4 is definitely rendering a more symmetrical rounded shape. My thanks to the writer of this most informative and well structured article. Also a question – do you ever use the Fujinon 18-55 kit zoom?? If yes, please can you write a piece about it?? I for one would greatly appreciate your thoughts about, and maybe a few images taken with this often maligned but also excellent small zoom. The supplied lens hood is made of plastic, but it is very small and discreet, and doesn’t detract particularly from the overall look of the lens. Although you can remove the lens hood, it’s not possible to reverse it and attach it to the lens for storage - but the hood is so small that you will probably just leave it on at all times.All of these lenses have a similar design and compact size. All have snappy autofocus, and they are all excellent value for money. There is no set number of feet that you need to be away to alleviate the problem, but we would probably say to stay at least 6-10 feet away from your subject or start stopping the lens down. I shoot handheld, and almost always with the available light. I use the F1.2 of the 56mm a lot during first dance and speeches for example.

I started to watch YouTube Videos, bought my first street photography books and challenged myself on the streets with different topics: lines, reflections, light and shadow or a specific color. What I learned: small towns do also have plenty of possibilities for street photography, you just have to find and see them.The f2 is nearly half the price of the f1.4, so unless the latter specifically calls to you, a pretty penny could be saved by getting the f2. If you’re looking to add to your travel gearand need a great lens, I’m sure the Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 WR lens has popped up on your radar. This means that it will provide a wide field of view, making it ideal for landscape and architectural photography. Additionally, the xf 23mm f2 has a minimum focal length of 2mm. This is good news for close-up photographers, as it means that they will be able to get close to their subject while still being able to capture a wide scene. XF 23mm f2 Review Lens Construction At the 23mm focal length, the angle of view is 63.4 degrees, to give a 35mm equivalent length of 35mm. Generally speaking most autofocus systems are good enough at this point. But put the Fuji 23mm f2 lens on a Fuji X-Pro2 or X-T2 and you’ve got a speed champion. I tested the lens on an X-Pro2 using the latest firmware and focus was snappy and reliable in all lighting conditions. No hunting, no weirdness. Just instant focus in whatever direction I pointed the camera.

The general shape of the lens is something one needs to get used to but in my eyes, it is not as worse as some people claim! The lens is just not pretty 😛 However, the weather resistance is a neat feature but only then useful if paired with a weather-resistant body. Nothing my Fujifilm X-T20 can claim for itself. When shooting at the widest aperture of f/2, it’s possible to see some slight drop-off in light at the corners of the image. This is particularly noticeable when shooting a white wall, but is unlikely to be overly noticeable for normal subjects. By f/2.8, the effect is lessened, and has gone completely by f/4. Distortion is kept to the absolute minimum in both raw and jpeg files. I tried the F2 lens on Saturday and even though its lighter, which means in theory I should be able to handhold and shooter at slower shutter speeds to reduce the higher ISO impact. It didn't work like that. I have found these two 23mm options to be similar in performance quality. It is not an apples-to-apples comparison as the X100V is a fixed lens option and the XF 23mm f/2 is a stand-alone lens option that can be used on a variety of Fujifilm X Series cameras.

Sometimes I need an even wider angle for some good reflection photos in puddles. And in other situations, I need a zoom lens to get good shots. I am very happy to have the possibility to change my lenses, even though I have the 23mm F2 99% of the time mounted on my X-T3.