B. Schade, A. K. Singh, V. Wycisk, J. L. Cuellar-Camacho, H. von Berlepsch, R. Haag and C. Böttcher, Chem. – Eur. J., 2020, 26, 6919–6934 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

N. Eshuis, B. J. A. van Weerdenburg, M. C. Feiters, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, S. S. Wijmenga and M. Tessari, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 1481 CrossRef CAS PubMed .J. Ujma, F. Benoit and P. E. Barran, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry II, Elsevier, 2nd edn, 2017, vol. 6, pp. 389–403 Search PubMed. H. Kumari, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry II, Elsevier, 2nd edn, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 289–302 Search PubMed. The magnitudes of a(H) could be predicted for three possible radical conformations in water ( Fig. 3C) and were compared to experimental values. It was demonstrated that the parameters of 5 fit very well to a dihedral angle of 120° between the aryl–C and N–O bonds (referred to as α in the following), which corresponds to structure C, whereas the dimethyl- and dichlorine-substituted species 6 and 7 likely adopt conformation A with α = 0° ( Fig. 3C). A. P. Deshmukh, D. Koppel, C. Chuang, D. M. Cadena, J. Cao and J. R. Caram, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019, 123, 18702–18710 CrossRef CAS. A. Kruve, K. Caprice, R. Lavendomme, J. M. Wollschläger, S. Schoder, H. V. Schröder, J. R. Nitschke, F. B. L. Cougnon and C. A. Schalley, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 11324–11328 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

E. Mezzina, R. Manoni, F. Romano and M. Lucarini, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2015, 4, 296–310 CrossRef CAS. J. Eills, E. Cavallari, C. Carrera, D. Budker, S. Aime and F. Reineri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 20209 CrossRef CAS PubMed . M. Sharma, G. Janssen, J. Leggett, A. P. Kentgens and P. J. van Bentum, J. Magn. Reson., 2015, 258, 40 CrossRef CAS PubMed . When comparing the 1H-NMR spectra of resorcin[4]arene 1 with and without glutaric acid 2, different guest signals of 2 are found upfield-shifted. Additionally, integration yielded a host–guest stoichiometry of around 1 : 1, indicating six enclosed guest molecules. The extend of the encapsulation process was shown to increase with higher concentrations of glutaric acid and longer reaction times, which was readily observable due to the high sensitivity of the host aryl peak at 6.1 ppm. This supported the proposed encapsulation mechanism and additionally indicated a slowly occurring exchange mechanism at the expense of solvent molecules, in this case chloroform. Intramolecular self-inclusion was another possible interpretation of the data, but this could be discounted with the use of DOSY NMR. In case of this hypothetical event, the diffusion coefficients of 3 in acidic solution would have remained similar compared to the monomer, whereas the experimental data shows a strong decrease of this value. This observation could only be explained with oligomers (or polymers).A. Ustinov, H. Weissman, E. Shirman, I. Pinkas, X. Zuo and B. Rybtchinski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16201–16211 CrossRef CAS PubMed.