a b c d e Aughinbaugh, Alison; Robles, Omar; Sun, Hugette (25 October 2013). "Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment". Monthly Labor Review. doi: 10.21916/mlr.2013.32. S2CID 157500067. Marriage has been weakened by a revisionist view of marriage that is more about adults’ desires than children’s needs.

The Marriage Effect : A Marriage of Convenience Sports Romance The Marriage Effect : A Marriage of Convenience Sports Romance

Seffrin, P. M. (2009). Structural disadvantage, heterosexual relationships and crime: life course consequences of environmental uncertainty. Bowling Green State University. A loving couple who seeks to bring out the best in one another can look forward to a long and fruitful life, enjoying their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren together. 4. Married people age more happilyGovernment can treat people equally—and leave them free to live and love as they choose—without redefining marriage. Jim Sanders, “Jerry Brown Vetoes Bill Allowing More Than Two Parents,” The Sacramento Bee, September 30, 2012, http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/09/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-allowing-more-than-two-parents.html (accessed March 6, 2013). a b c d Perelli-Harris, Brienna; Hoherz, Stefanie; Addo, Fenaba; Lappegård, Trude; Evans, Ann; Sassler, Sharon; Styrc, Marta (October 2018). "Do Marriage and Cohabitation Provide Benefits to Health in Mid-Life? The Role of Childhood Selection Mechanisms and Partnership Characteristics Across Countries". Population Research and Policy Review. 37 (5): 703–728. doi: 10.1007/s11113-018-9467-3. ISSN 0167-5923. PMC 6267248. PMID 30546176. Marriage benefits everyone because separating childbearing and childrearing from marriage burdens innocent bystanders: not just children, but the whole community. Often, the community must step in to provide (more or less directly) for their well-being and upbringing. Thus, by encouraging the marriage norms of monogamy, sexual exclusivity, and permanence, the state is strengthening civil society and reducing its own role.

Temporal Consideration of the Marriage Effect | SpringerLink

Savolainen, J. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance. The British Journal of Criminology, 49, 285–304. Forrest, W., & Hay, C. (2011). Life-course transitions, self-control and desistance from crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), 487–513. Redefining marriage would further disconnect childbearing from marriage. That would hurt children, especially the most vulnerable. It would deny as a matter of policy the ideal that children need a mother and a father. Traditional marriage laws reinforce the idea that a married mother and father is the most appropriate environment for rearing children, as the best available social science suggests. Many citizens are increasingly tempted to think that marriage is simply an intense emotional union, whatever sort of interpersonal relationship consenting adults, whether two or 10 in number, want it to be—sexual or platonic, sexually exclusive or open, temporary or permanent. This leaves marriage with no essential features, no fixed core as a social reality. It is simply whatever consenting adults want it to be.

Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69. Yet if marriage has no form and serves no social purpose, how will society protect the needs of children—the prime victim of our non-marital sexual culture—without government growing more intrusive and more expensive? Craig, J. M., Diamond, B., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Marriage as an intervention in the lives of criminal offenders. In J. A. Humphrey & P. Cordella (Eds.), Effective Interventions in the Lives of Criminal Offenders (pp. 19–37). New York: Springer. Loren Marks, “Same-Sex Parenting and Children’s Outcomes: A Closer Examination of the American Psychological Association’s Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting,” Social Science Research, Vol. 41, No. 4 (July 2012), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X12000580 (accessed March 4, 2013). Marriage connects people and goods that otherwise tend to fragment. It helps to connect sex with love, men with women, sex with babies, and babies with moms and dads. [1] Social, cultural, and legal signals and pressures can support or detract from the role of marriage in this regard.

Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of

Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064. Lawson, David W.; James, Susan; Ngadaya, Esther; Ngowi, Bernard; Mfinanga, Sayoki G. M.; Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique (10 November 2015). "No evidence that polygynous marriage is a harmful cultural practice in northern Tanzania". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (45): 13827–13832. Bibcode: 2015PNAS..11213827L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507151112. PMC 4653144. PMID 26504213.Numerous studies have been conducted along these lines, and the scientific findings of the effects of marriage on health have been very revealing and surprising in some instances. Government needs to get marriage policy right because it shapes the norms associated with this most fundamental relationship. Redefining marriage would abandon the norm of male–female sexual complementarity as an essential characteristic of marriage. Making that optional would also make other essential characteristics of marriage—such as monogamy, exclusivity, and permanency—optional. [30] Weakening marital norms and severing the connection of marriage with responsible procreation are the admitted goals of many prominent advocates of redefining marriage. The emotional support that healthy couples give to each other is also something that helps them get well soon.