Baronti, F.; Roncella, R.; Saletti, R. Performance comparison of active balancing techniques for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 267, 603–609. [ Google Scholar] [ CrossRef][ Green Version] Liu, W.; Song, Y.; Liao, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Jiao, Y.; Peng, J.; Huang, Z. Distributed voltage equalization design for supercapacitors using state observer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 55, 620–630. [ Google Scholar] [ CrossRef]

The simulation and comparisons on performance among CP mode, PP mode, and the hybrid modes are provided. Hasan, M.K.; Habib, A.A.; Islam, S.; Ghani, A.T.A.; Hossain, E. Resonant energy carrier base active charge-balancing algorithm. Electronics 2020, 9, 2166. [ Google Scholar] [ CrossRef] Signal waveform of inductors (L)1 and (L)2. 2.2. Equalization Circuit Parameters 2.2.1. PWM Duty Cycle Initially, assuming that the inconsistency of battery energy satisfies a normal distribution, and the average equilibrium time of the two battery modules is recorded as t 0, the average equilibrium time of each system in the experiment can be obtained. In the experiment, when the number of batteries is two, both the multi-phase interleaved converter and the jumper switch converter degenerate into the bypass converter, and the average equalization time of the equalization process is t 0. When the number of batteries is four, the average equalization time of the three converters is increased. The average equalization time of multi-phase interleaved converters and jumper switch converters is slightly lower than that of bypass converters. This trend is obvious as the number of batteries increases. Furthermore, when the number of batteries increases, the advantages of the jumper switch converter will gradually accumulate, and its average equalization time will be much shorter than the other two solutions.Equalization results based on mean-difference algorithm and AFNN algorithm in the three states. 6. Conclusion Due to the difference in battery capacity and consistency, the balance will eventually differ by a few MV, and there is no uniform standard.

Uno, M.; Ueno, T.; Yoshino, K. Cell Voltage Equalizer Using a Selective Voltage Multiplier with a Reduced Selection Switch Count for Series-Connected Energy Storage Cells. Electronics 2019, 8, 1303. [ Google Scholar] [ CrossRef][ Green Version] Hong, S.; Jiang, J.; Li, X. A battery management system with two-stage equalization. In Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Chongqing, China, 28–30 May 2017. [ Google Scholar]Liu, L.; Xu, B.; Yan, Z.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Mai, R.; He, Z. A low-cost multiwinding transformer balancing topology for retired series-connected battery string. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 36, 4931–4936. [ Google Scholar] [ CrossRef]