The .3 is available in both laced and lacess versions, whereas the + only comes in laceless. In lieu of multi-layered Tension Tape upper, the .3 uses a single layer of synthetic mesh, capped around the tongue and collar with an elastic criss-crossed material (tensioned in the case of the laceless .3). The soleplate is a single plastic piece, in contrast to the split sole Torsion System, with the same stud layout. The .3's graphics is a representation of the grip elements found on the top-level Nemeziz. How does the .3 feel on feet and which among the laced and laceless .3s is better? The .3 is available in both laced and lacess versions, whereas the + only comes in laceless. In lieu of multi-layered Tension Tape upper, the 19.3 uses a single layer of synthetic mesh, capped around the tongue and collar with an elastic criss-crossed material (tensioned in the case of the laceless 19.3). The soleplate is a single plastic piece, in contrast to the split sole Torsion System, with the same stud layout. How does the 19.3 feel on feet and which among the laced and laceless 19.3s is better? adidas do have Kid-specific makes for the Nemeziz 19.3 available in FG-specific (laced and laceless) and MG (laced only) soleplates. Does the 19.3 have other soleplate versions for muddy pitches, 3G or Turf?

Soleplate's thinner plastic avoids it from being awkwardly stiff and makes it arguably better than the 19.2The .3 does have an IN and Turf-specific boots but no soft grounded ones. The closest .3 has for artificial grass is the MG variation of the laced Nemeziz takedown boot. Other than the shallow heel fit, 19.3 on feet feels good; material around the ankle wraps very closely and the mesh upper feels nice and soft; laces needed to be tight especially with the looseness of the ankle material