There is however an important catch: the app may deliver the location for up to 60 minutes worth of shooting, but the actual co-ordinates themselves won’t be updated during this time – even if you move from the original position where you initiated the process. The result is you could end up with multiple images taken in different locations, all tagged with the exact same co-ordinates as the first image in the sequence.

The upgrade allows users to enlarge indicators and information in the viewfinder and/or LCD monitor. This upgrade will also enable users to customize the location of where the information is shown on the display. The X100F is the fourth iteration of Fujifilm's well-respected X100 series. It still uses the same 35mm equivalent 23mm F2 lens, still has the 'classic' design cues, but almost everything has changed under the surface.Update: The X100F is now almost two years old, and it’s not just the competition that’s moved on but Fujifilm’s own sensor technology too, so we’ve updated our review to reflect the latest changes. There are rumors of an updated version with Fujifilm 26.1MP X-Trans sensor coming soon Features

They’re simply the tools that are right for me. Sure you can get other cameras, more technically advanced cameras, faster focusing cameras, sturdier built cameras. But for me there are no better cameras! The size/weight distribution makes the Fujifilm X100F feel solid and exclusive without being too heavy.

That seems like a really bizarre way to show off a camera's capabilities. What was the thought process behind it? It shows only the downsides of feature and none of the advantages or usefulness. I like the Nikkor 24mm f2.8, I have one it gets quite a lot of use. I ended up buying a fast Nikkor 35mm a couple of days ago, .. The results are good. And again I'm getting a 50mm field of view, ... Very familiar with this type of shooting. :) Last week I bought a Nikon D500 and I was about to buy a fast 24mm Prime. My good friend who manages our local camera store suggested the X100F as it was in the same price range as a Prime. ... Done! (We had discussed this option since the first X100.)

What seemed more important was the impact on image quality, which we figured would be most easily assessed by showing the same detail at the same size. In other words, we were trying to test the impact, rather than illustrating the feature. Also on top of the camera is a function button, which can be set to a setting of your choice - by default it accesses “photometry”, which is Fujifilm’s term for metering. Part of this is thanks to the lower base ISO of 160 on the new sensor, compared to 200 on the X100F. Both cameras, however, top out at ISO 12,800, and both can be expanded to 51,200. Despite the BSI design and the new X-Processor 4 image processor, our experience with previous models shows a slight noise advantage to the older sensor at high ISO settings. The difference, however, is minimal. Autofocus and performance

Fujifilm X100F review: Features

The X100F is equipped with an innovative hybrid viewfinder or a screen for composition. I’ll briefly mention the latter as the real excitement of the camera lies with its viewfinder. I suspect some areas of the frame look soft in the studio comparison due to moustache-shaped field curvature, so it would indeed look better in the real world. That being said, I had the X100S for a while, and the lens clearly had some quite severe limitations at 16MP...

I think this has been mentioned a few times by others and, at first I wondered what they meant. After a good few weeks with the camera now, I definitely agree that the Q button is in the wrong place and I keep catching it with my thumb; annoying. FLASH MODE TTL(FLASH AUTO / STANDARD / SLOW SYNC.) / MANUAL / COMMANDER / OFF SYNC. MODE 1ST CURTAIN / 2ND CURTAIN A common gripe with Fujifilm shooters is the rather underwhelming battery performance. Fujifilm claims although the battery is the same NP-W126S in both cameras, the X100V can shoot 350 frames when using the electronic viewfinder, and 420 frames when using the optical viewfinder per charge. That’s an increase on the 270 (EVF) and 390 (OVF) frames on the X100F. Still, the performance on each isn’t great. Considering the new X-T4 promises 600 frames per charge, the new X100V is well under par by today’s standards.

Does the X100F still have that magic X factor for traditional camera fans?

This taught me to see how a 50mm sees on every subject. I now spend a lot of time with every new lens. The Remote Control option shows a live image from the camera, surrounded by shooting information and a selection of buttons underneath. A slider at the bottom lets you choose between shooting stills or filming video, after which pressing the big red and silver release button above will trigger your choice. If you slide the control to video, the live view reformats to 16:9 for easier framing. With its distinctly old-fashioned design, you might expect the X100F to have a lowly feature set. But in reality, it’s surprisingly well equipped. Let’s start with the key imaging specs. The sensor and processor are the same as Fujifilm used to great effect in the X-Pro2 and X-T2 last year, and enable a standard sensitivity range of ISO 200-12,800. Pulled ISO 100 and extended ISO 25,600 and 51,200 settings are also available. Above: Fujifilm X100F (left) next to the Panasonic Lumix GX800 / GX850 (right). The Lumix has a slightly smaller sensor and no viewfinder, but is a full interchangeable lens camera with an articulated touchscreen and 4k video. Like previous X-Trans sensors, the latest version III employs an APS-C area with Fujifilm’s unique colour filter array that allows the absence of an optical low pass filter for the ultimate crispness without suffering from moire. The difference now is the image resolution has increased from 4896×3264 to 6000×4000 pixels, allowing you to output 2in taller and 3in wider than the X100T at 300dpi.