Lu, J., & Wang, C. (2020). A response time process model for not-reached and omitted items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 57(4), 584–620. Geiger, M. A. (1991). Changing multiple−choice answers: A validation and extension. College Student Journal, 25, 181–186.

Geiger, M. A. (1991). Changing multiple−choice answers: Do students accurately perceive their performance? Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 250–257.Ramsey, P. H., Ramsey, P. P., & Barnes, M. J. (1987). Effects of student confidence and item difficulty on test score gains due to answer changing. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 206–210. Lunz, M. E., Bergstrom, B. A., & Wright, B. D. (1992). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(1), 33–40.

Pohl, S., Ulitzsch, E., & von Davier, M. (2019). Using response times to model not-reached items due to time limits. Psychometrika, 84(3), 829–892.

McMorris, R. F., DeMers, L. P., & Schwarz, S. P. (1987). Attitudes, behaviors, and reasons for changing responses following answer−changing instruction. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(2), 131–143. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurementin Education and Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, et al. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. Bjorklund, D. F. (1989). Children’s thinking—Developmental function and individual differences. Brooks/Cole. But there is a menace deep inside the Pandora Institute. And Kate, Osgood and Josh must face their darkest fears…