Babies were supplied from all over the world. They were bought, injected with drugs, and sent by TNT or DHL to London to be abused, tortured, and sacrificed. years since the Hampstead Child Therapy Clinic, now the Anna Freud Centre, was awarded charitable status. There was intermittent concern about P’s relationship with her mother and also that both children were presenting as and complaining of being hungry at school. In 2004, two children living in London – P& Q– would make a series of allegations against their father and members of London’s establishment.

Hampstead school at centre of false satanic cult allegation

Subsequently, Dr Hodes took this case to a peer review meeting. As explained in her Amended Medical Report of 4 December 2014, her anogenital findings in relation to both children were then significantly amended. The previously confirmed fissures were said to be irregularities in the ruggae (folds, wrinkles or ridges) and their clinical significance was described as “ possible normal variant.” About two thirds of the way through the discussion, Mr Christie and Ms Draper tells Mr Yaohirou that they had only “ discovered this … four weeks ago.” Mr Christie said he had his “ first suspicions – about almost two months ago – when he first heard (Mr Dearman’s) voice on the Skype.” That was when he’d had his suspicions. Mr Yaohirou asked, “ Oh, from the tone of his voice?” Mr Christie replied, “ Yes.” He added, “ And also because of the clues … from them touching the dog.” P said, “ We’d be touching the dog’s privates.” Mr Christie added, “ So another clue is I began to suspect heavily and then when we got to Morocco and I realised they were touching each other on a regular basis I said to them, ‘You guys are doing this regularly. How come no one’s caught you? Who else is touching you? Who is, I know someone else is touching you, you’ve learnt this from an adult, who is it? Who is it?’ And then they opened this bag [?]“ But I do note that flooding immigrants into other lands does seem to bear an uncanny resemblance to Daniel 2. The internet is a fascinating place to be right now if one seeks out the right topics, such as: I was troubled too that the children were subjected to intimate examinations to search for further signs twice in five days. I regret that Dr Hodes was not asked exactly what she hoped to gain by the second examination positioning the children differently. The 2008 Review suggests, arising out of Myrhe’s 2001 study, that there are differences in the muscle tone in the two positions. In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.) https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/playlist-of-45-videos-re-whistleblower-of-whistleblowerkids/ The second examinations occurred on 16 September. The resulting reports written that day, relate that the purpose was to meet the foster carer and children again for further history and medical examination, as well as for police photography of the injuries. When she gave evidence, Dr Hodes described more of the rationale for asking to re-examine the children’s genital areas. She said, “ I’ve got this allegation which has been made to several people…” Dr Hodes had thought about it over the weekend and, “ on reflection believed (she) should have examined the children in the ‘knee chest’ position.” She added, “ it’s not what you do it’s how you do it.” The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties. Q’s interview on the same day comprises explicit details of penetrative abuse upon him and sexual acts he was made to perform upon others. He gave an account of “ rubbing” until “ the white stuff” comes out of boys. Q continued, “ And it’s really dangerous, my Mum told me never put it on a girl’s privates because … if I put it in my sister’s privates she’s create a baby … but the baby would have a problem and it might be blind and it might walk like this and … keep falling over… it might have no teeth” Asked what the white stuff felt like, Q said it “ just feels like wee … it’s like a seed. … You have to have a microscope to see it.” Q also said that “ lots” of this white stuff came out of his willy, “ Like you can fill up like half of a bottle – a normal, like this big bottle.”

Our history | Anna Freud Our history | Anna Freud

Even though these allegations against Dearman were fictitious – and would eventually be dismissed as “baseless” by a high court judge asked to look into the case by social services – they became a full-blown conspiracy theory when Draper began working with two activists, in a custody battle for the two children. One of them started a public campaign about the case, depicting Draper as innocent. The other, who claimed to believe Draper, uploaded the original allegation videos and list of names online, which were viewed millions of times across the world. I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish. All the indications are that over a period of some weeks last summer, P and Q were forced by Mr Christie and Ms Draper, working in partnership, to provide concocted accounts of horrific events. The stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is a strong word but it is the most accurate way to describe what was done to the children by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper. The second medical report was done after they retracted the allegations, is this why they now accuse Abe of physical abuse at least. The only persisting physical sign post peer review was reflex anal dilatation in P which, so Dr Hodes, maintains is “ consistent with her allegation of the blunt penetrating force to her anus i.e. sexual abuse.” In evidence she referred to her colleagues agreeing it was “ abnormal and striking.” It is a sign which is “ rarely seen.” In her written report she also said, “ There is evidence in the literature that the absence of physical signs neither supports not (sic) refutes an allegation of anal penetration. In this case it was alleged that lubrication was used which adds to the probability of abuse.“Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that. It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.

Hampstead satanic abuse cult Timeline: How ‘fantasy’ Hampstead satanic abuse cult

In response to Mr Yaohirou’s question as to whether the neighbour attended the meeting, Ms Draper replied, “ She was in the parties, you know, these fun set (?sex) parties.” She then asked the children, “ did she … participate in, you know, killing babies and drink the blood and all this?” One of the children replied, “ Yes, yes, yes, but she doesn’t, she doesn’t touch, like, she doesn’t go near the children – she does, sometimes drink the blood, she does.” The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.It has been necessary for the police to protect worried parents and children at the gates of the school in Hampstead at the centre of the allegations. Prospective parents have wondered whether to withdraw their children from allocated places. Existing parents have been uniformly supportive of the school and every member of the teaching staff. There was no change in the presentation of either child when they described apparently horrific acts as experienced by them and others. There did not appear to be any emotional connection with what they were saying except that they seemed energised. Mr Christie is directive towards the children saying, “ Be quiet and go outside now, come on. Hurry up. Outside. Outside. Outside. I don’t play around, just stay there. That’s it. That’s right, discipline.” And a little later, “ Sit round the table properly, son. Don’t let me tell you again, you sit down properly, thank you. Thank you. Don’t let me tell you again, sit down at the table properly.” He adds a few minutes later, “ and you speak when you’re spoken to. You understand? Come on. Let’s have some respect … let’s help each other and let’s make sure that no more children get killed, ay?” One of the children adds, “ And make sure papa goes to jail.” The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one. On 4 June 2014, there was a scene in the playground at Christchurch School when Mr Christie was collecting P and Q at the end of the school day. He was loud and aggressive, accusing the teachers of poisoning the children by giving them the food supplied at the school. By the middle of June, according to Ms Draper, Mr Christie was staying over at her home on two or three nights each week.

Channel 4 commissions Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax

Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions. http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/health/royal_free_hospital_in_hampstead_to_be_investigated_over_links_with_jimmy_savile_1_3058052 Our Argument: They did not recant UNTIL they were in the care of the authorities; e.i. When the 3rd element/factor was in place. Neither Draper nor Christie attended, perhaps in fear that they will be prosecuted now that the full extent of their abuse has been exposed. Mr Christie then asks the children to say who has done this. The children reply, “ Everybody does.” In response to his direct questions, “ Who, who, who?” the children say, “ Papa, Mr Hollings – the school …” The mother interjects, “ Parents.” Q adds, “ My dad’s family.” Mr Christie then says, “ Tell me more people, tell me some more people because I’m interested.” P adds, “ Parents, policemen –.”Mr Christie asks, “ What about the teachers at the school, who are the main ones?” The children give names and then they are asked what the head teacher does. Both reply simultaneously, “ And she does sex.” Next Mr Christie asks, “ And what happens in the church?” P replies, “ And we do sex with the baby sacrifice and eat the baby.” Mr Christie asks what she means and she says, “ So we kill the baby and eat it and drink the blood from it.” Mr Christie asks Q whether that is true. He replies, “ Yes. And we dance with the skulls… Baby skulls.”