Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes Soil compaction and density tests - Compaction control test - Density index method for a cohesionless material (Reconfirmed 2016) Plastics piping systems for soil and waste discharge (low and high temperature) inside buildings - Polyethylene (PE) (Reconfirmed 2017) At what discount rate would you be indifferent between these two projects? (Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) The regulator has previously relied on its own telephone surveys or separate health surveys conducted by each of the UK home nations.

Masonry units, pavers, flags and segmental retaining wall units Pavers and flags (Reconfirmed 2020) In 2020, Kenny Alexander, then Ladbrokes boss, told a select committee hearing: “Ninety-nine per cent of our customers will lose.” Plastics piping systems - Glass reinforced thermoplastics (GRP) systems based on unsaturated polyester (UP) resin Pressure and non-pressure water supply (ISO 10639:2004, MOD) First up we have the Cinebench R20 multi-core results and here the 3500X doesn't look great. Yes, it's still faster than the Core i5-9400F, but it's slower than even the first-gen Ryzen 5 1600X. It is 6% slower than the R5 2600 and a whopping 27% slower than the R5 3600.Things look even worse when running the Corona benchmark, much worse in fact. Here the 3500X is only able to match the Core i5-9400F, which means it's 27% slower than the R5 1600 and 43% slower than the R5 2600. When compared to the R5 3600 we're talking about a 60% increase in render time, so creators on a budget are much better off with a Ryzen 2600 or similar. Guide to the protection of structural steel against atmospheric corrosion by the use of protective coatings Paint coatings ACO does become a little more GPU bound at 1440p and this helps the 3500X out as it's not able to match the Ryzen 5 2600X, and really deliver similar performance to the R5 3600. Performance from the mid-range to top end is pretty similar under these more GPU limited test conditions. As we saw when testing with Cinebench, for those looking for a budget productivity processor, the 3500X isn't it. In V-ray benchmark we see that the 3500X was 6% slower than the old Ryzen 5 1600 and almost 20% slower than the R5 2600.

Polyethylene and polypropylene pipes and fittings for drainage and sewerage applications (Reconfirmed 2017)

Documents & Downloads

Data Collection Software v3.3 provides the features and functionality that researchers have been requesting to take their research even further. Powered by the Windows™ 10 operating system, our newest and most powerful data collection software provides: Capillary fittings of copper and copper alloy for non-pressure sanitary plumbing applications (Reconfirmed 2018)

Thus in single-core Cinebench it's basically on par with the Core i7-8700K, making it 25% faster than the R5 2600 and even 9% faster than the Core i5-9400F.Finally we have Total War: Three Kingdoms and here the 3500X is comparable to the first-gen Ryzen 5 1600X, so the 3600 was much better when looking at 1% low figures. Here the 3600 was almost 40% faster which is a massive performance uplift thanks to the use of SMT. Hitman 2 played well on the 3500X, certainly well enough despite the 1% lows taking a bigger hit than what you'll experience on a modern 8 and 12-thread processor. Performance overall was comparable to the Ryzen 5 2600, at least when testing at 1080p. The Ryzen 5 3500X also struggles a bit in The Division 2, delivering poor 1% low performance when compared to even the first-gen Ryzen 5 1600. Again we see that the average frame rate performance is quite good, but it's the 1% low performance that you should focus on here. Naturally, for those running wanting to run core-heavy applications, the 3500X might not be the best fit. The Betting & Gaming Council, the industry standards body that also lobbies on behalf of the sector, said the figures were experimental and remained “under evaluation”.