While the recommendation of Sinatra might be impressive enough, if you have worked in the music biz for a long time, you will probably have encountered the SM58 yourself. The Shure SM58 are notably known for their powerhouse construction. It’s almost guaranteed to last you years without failing. In fact, I still use the SM58 I bought over 20 years ago, and it’s still flawless. Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.

The Shure SM58 has a wider frequency range, especially at lower frequencies, a lower impedance, and far superior noise distortion reduction. Did you know Old Blue Eyes himself, Frank Sinatra, always insisted on his favorite Shure SM58 when performing?It's virtually useless live if you want to connect it along with other condenser mics to the same mixer because of the unbalanced output transformer (unlike every single stage mic, Behringer included!). For live performance, this tips the odd slightly in the favor of the SM58, with the lower weight allowing the performer to release their full energy without feeling weighed down. The heavier weight can often be a deal breaker for some artists looking at the SM58 vs PG58 dynamic microphones.

Both microphones are constructed of die-cast metal, although the PG58 comes in slightly heavier at 22.5 ounces compared to the estimated 10.5 ounces of the SM58. Both microphones, the SM58 and the PG58 have a cardioid polar pattern and enjoy the inherent noise cancellation perks from such a feature. For 10 or 20 euros less, you have a T bone MBBeta85 (39 euros), incomparably better and truly usable condition Live it. Two, not to use a cable longer than 6 / 10 meters at the risk of unavoidable noise chopper (forget multicore and Co.).

For the spoken word

As a beginner, you may not notice too much the higher impendence, the handling noise, the lightly lower frequency range, and the extra weight of the more affordable PG58. While these may sound like minor differences considering the lower price of the PG58, when it comes to noise cancellation, the SM58 shines way above the PG58. Unless you intend on using them with extremely long XLR cables, both mics work pretty standardly for the impedance they feature. Winner: Draw Noise Isolation The PG58 offers the same durability with only slightly less performance but, unfortunately, can distort when used in more energetic live performances. I place it on a tripod to avoid the effect of microphonics which is important on the micro, but it restores trs well my way!

Although it won’t be as bright as a condenser microphone using phantom power, the frequencies are perfectly set for live performances. It was also one of the first not to feature an on/off switch, as most performers would prefer to switch the mic off at the mixer or soundboard rather than accidentally catch the switch mid-song. Moreso, the Shure PG48 has a rather questionable (but apparently accepted) impedance of 600 ohms. So try not to run this microphone's sound through any long cables of any sort. Also, the microphone needs a painful amount of juice, resulting in inevitable noise. Higher impendence mics with longer cables will lose some of the crisp top ends, especially in live situations.

What's in the box:

This PG Alta series microphone is great for use with karaoke, live vocals and speech. Whether you’re singing with friends or need a quality microphone for conferences and business presentations; the Shure PGA48 is an affordable microphone that you can rely on. Although they are durable and well-designed microphones, it is never recommended to connect a dynamic mic to an XLR input that has phantom power supplied. One, the output level is still lower than for a normal microphone will therefore require further push the input gain at the risk of chopper of breath and have made it even worse.

However, can the less expensive PG58 offer a similar experience? What Is The Difference Between Shure SM58 And PG58? Feature That said — the PG58 is also built well, but whether it can hold up to the esteemed construction of the SM58 is up for debate. PG58 vs SM58: Sound Quality Frequency ResponseThe SM58 would be the obvious way to go with its durability and performance, making it the go-to choice of many artists and sound engineers. Where this really comes into play, and you see what the difference between Shure SM58 and PG58 is with live performances, especially those not using a mic stand. You would be forgiven for assuming that due to the lower price point, the PG58 isn’t quite as durable as the power tank that is the SM58. Although both microphones look almost identical and many argue have a similar sound, when used in larger sound settings, there are some noticeable differences in the sound quality and clarity of the two microphones. Frequency Range, Noise Cancellation & Other Tech Specs Shure played on the prestige of its image, gained from its other products, to continue to propose, without scruple, dung at exorbitant prices!