Hello my fellow professional chess players. I wanted to write a short review of the book шахматы or The Soviet Chess Primer as it is commonly known by Western imperialists. I figured such review would go over the heads of the babies that frequent r/chess and only the good readers of r/anarchychess would fully understand. I thanked him for his trust into my abilities. To be fair, I indeed won the junior boardahead of Ivanchukthe year before (1987) as well as the year later (1989), where I scored 12.5 out of 13 games. Still I insisted that I would prefer to play in the World Junior Championship. In the original Russian, this landmark work is simply called “Chess”– no other explanation was considered necessary. The Soviet Chess Primer is a modern English translation of Maizelis’s witty introduction to the royal game. After our colonel greeted me, he asked where I would prefer to play: in the World Junior Championship,which was supposed to take place in Adelaide, Australiain about a month, or in the team Army Championship, which was scheduled at exactly the same time in Riga.

The Soviet Chess Primer is a modern English translation of Ilya Maizelis’s classic introduction to the game, which was simply titled “Chess” in the original Russian publication. It has been read by generations of players, including, most notably, Garry Kasparov and Anatoly Karpov, who each provide accolades for the book cover. Maizelis’ book is fascinating, especially for the reader interested in chess culture and history, but it is not a primer by any stretch of the imagination. Despite my reservations about the title, The Soviet Chess Primer is a fine book and its acclaim is deserved." From the other side I knew that if I miss what could have been the opportunityof my whole life, I would never forgive myself for being a coward. So, trying to compose myself I said: "Thank you sir!" -- hoping that my trembling voice didn't give up my emotional state. In the foreword to this new edition, Mark Dvoretsky describes the The Soviet Chess Primer as “a teaching manual with an excellent selection of material convincingly presented, and a bright outward design. At the same time it is more than just a textbook. It is a story of chess as a whole, and thus its title wholly fits its content. Of course, this is not a book for the very young (writers for them go about it differently), but it will be very interesting and useful for schoolchildren and adults alike.”

Customer reviews

The main contribution of the Soviet School of Chess was not the style of players but their emphasis on rigorous training and study of the game, i.e. considering chess a sport rather than an art or science." This new edition of a timeless classic includes an original foreword from the 2nd World Champion, Emanuel Lasker, as well as an introduction from the most celebrated chess trainer of modern times, Mark Dvoretsky. You seem to waste a lot of time making off-topic comments...more than most. You should use that time study chess instead...unless the comment is useful and not off-topic. At the end of 1980s, I was drafted to the Soviet army and sent to the city of Novosibirsk, which was located in the Siberian Military District. Taking the opportunty, let me assure you my dear readers that contrary to popular belief, there are no bears on the streets of Siberian cities. I'm curious. How do you figure that I don't actually "do anything?" Are you asking, or do you have me on camera?

Now let me ask you a simple question. It is a well-known fact that the Soviet team won practically every single event it played. I am talking about chess olympiads, European and world championships, etc. Then he asked me if I could guarantee that I would win a medal in the World Junior Championship. I immediately remembered a similar situation that happened before the final Candidate match of 1974 between Karpov and Korchnoi. The winner was going to play the world championship match vs. Fischer. Botvinnik’s example and teaching established the modern approach to preparing for competitive chess: regular but moderate physical exercise; analysing very thoroughly a relatively narrow repertoire of openings; annotating one’s own games, those of past great players and those of competitors; publishing one’s annotations so that others can point out any errors; studying strong opponents to discover their strengths and weaknesses; ruthless objectivity about one’s own strengths and weaknesses." However, in the last decade, the Russian team (which consists of the players who were raised and trained by the same Soviet chess machine) hardly won any Olympiads, despite of being heavy favorite in every single one of them. Most Quality Chess titles are original works, but from time to time the company puts out translations of older classics not available in English. This book, which was first published in the mid-1930s, has been continuously in print since then, appearing in several updated editions.The authors argue tragic examples like these are ultimately stopping society from moving forward, and therefore, if more people stopped playing chess and became socially and politically conscious, forgo their democracy for a large bureaucratic apparatus such as the Soviet state, then we could explore space, together. Maizelis is said to have had a close relationship with Emanuel Lasker, and even translated Lasker’s Manual of Chess into Russian. The second world champion wrote the foreword to the original publication, “The Meaning of Chess,” in which he gives a brief historical account of the game and describes the virtues of playing. For instance, he writes “A chessplayer is greatly benefited, and his culture enhanced, by the fact that he accustoms himself to struggle in the very process of playing, and that he trains himself to form indispensable plans on the basis of much experience.” But today I am going to tell this big bad secret only to the readers of Chess.com. The story from my youth will be the best explanation of this secret.