Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
And while this chip is slightly more expensive than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D was when it launched, the price inflation isn't the worst I've seen, so I won't complain too much on that front. In contrast, Intel's chips consume far more power in every type of workload, resulting in higher thermal output. In fact, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D appears to fall into the standard 65W profile that specs a maximum of 88W of power consumption (PPT). AMD has spec'd a higher 120W TDP rating for the 7800X3D, but it appears to be running closer to the 65W TDP envelope during normal use — given our measurements, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 120W TDP rating seems far overprovisioned. This means the chip is basically operating in Eco Mode, which confers massive power consumption and efficiency benefits.
Having extra cache certainly can improve performance, though. One of the most commonly known things about computers is that more RAM can help your PC work faster, and cache is in many ways no different from RAM. Though both are essential, and having more is often beneficial, having too much of either can be detrimental, or at least accrue no additional benefit. Higher-capacity RAM kits often run at slower speeds, and the overabundance of cache on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D forces it to run at slower speeds, too. This is already an enormous amount of L3 cache to have on a chip, but AMD pushes this to the next level by applying a 64MB 3D V-Cache chip to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s CCX. In total, this gives the Ryzen 7 7800X3D a massive 96MB of L3 cache. However, the 3D V-Cache cache might be better referred to as L4 cache, as it is architecturally separate from the CCX’s L3. The 3D V-Cache is also ever so slightly slower, though AMD has said the performance difference here is exceedingly small. Our updated CPU suite for 2023 includes various benchmarks, tests, and workloads designed to show variance in performance between different processors and architectures. These include UL's latest Procyon suite with both office and photo editing workloads simulated to measure performance in these tasks, CineBench R23, Dwarf Fortress, Blender 3.3, and C-Ray 1.1. Console always outsells PC for gaming. The irony is that console games are often developed on PCs or devkits that are more PC like than consoles and the PC ports of these games are as you say, crap. The thing is that the library of games for PC will almost certainly be bigger than any one family of consoles. Emulators also exist for PC. I am personally not a big fan of super basic games like Zelda, but you are definitely correct that game franchises like these sell consoles like coffee on a cold Monday morning.Finally, I took all of the datapoints I'd gathered and compared the average scores of each processor tested for this review against its retail price, current as of this review, to measure how good of a value this processor is or isn't.
Calling these test scores for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uninspiring for the money wouldn’t be too far off of the mark. We don’t say such things lightly, but all of the processors we just named cost less—some, like the Ryzen 5 7600 and the Core i5-12600K, by hundreds of dollars. Regardless, the Core i5-12600K had as much as a 12% performance advantage in select tests, and the two chips effectively tied in the best test-case scenario for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. The cheaper Ryzen 7 7700X was also faster than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D by as much as 24%. Gaming Tests If you're concerned about building a gaming-focused rig and everything else is a secondary concern, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is by far the superior chip over the 13900K in terms of both outright performance and value. However, the Core i9-13900K is a better option than the 7800X3D if you use productivity applications frequently, and ensuring the highest level of performance is paramount. You should also consider that AMD has both the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 97900X3D on offer, both of which offer more cores for the productivity minded while maintaining 13900K-beating levels of gaming performance. Just be prepared to pay for the privilege of faster gaming performance. The P-cores come with a 3.0 GHz base, but, more importantly, a 5.8 GHz boost that's a whopping 600 MHz increase over the prior gen. Meanwhile, the E-cores now have a 3.0 GHz base (+600 MHz) and stretch up to 4.3 GHz (+400 MHz). The Core i9-13900K also has 32MB of L3 and 36MB of L2 cache. The Core i9-13900K and 13700K have a more balanced profile in both single- and multi-threaded productivity applications than the 7800X3D, delivering solid performance in both disciplines. In contrast, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D suffers mightily in these workloads compared to the Intel silicon, highlighting that this is truly a highly specialized chip for gaming that won't offer as much performance in standard workloads as the regular Ryzen 7000 processors.
But the main reason none of my friends are upgrading their PC is not even the price, it's just that PC games have been so bad lately.
Great Deal 
New Comment