TP-Link AX1800 Dual Band Gigabit Wall Plate Wi-Fi 6 Access Point, Power over Ethernet (802.3 af/at), System Requirements Microsoft Windows XP/7/8/10 and Vista, Easily Mount to Wall (EAP615-Wall)

Product Information

In any case, the TP-Link EAP615-Wall still does support Seamless Roaming, so, as long as the client device supports 802.11k/v, you should be able to move from AP to AP in a seamless manner. Just be aware that the Omada controller is required for this function to be enabled. Lastly, know that the TP-Link EAP615-Wall does not support the AI Roaming, while the EAP610 does support it. Now let’s talk a bit about the PoE pass-through. Preparing for the WiFi test. MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=2, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=2 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=4, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=4, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) And that’s pretty much the point of upgrading to WiFi 6 because you will see a proper difference when you have lots of compatible client devices connected to the AP. Besides OFDMA, the TP-Link EAP615-Wall supports 80MHz channel bandwidth and, considering that it’s an AX1800-class device, it does seem similar to the EAP610. TP-Link EAP615-Wall plate WiFi 6 Access Point.

Come gestire i dispositivi Omada in diversi siti utilizzando il Controller Omada SDN via VPN (Controller 5.0 o successivo) 05-02-2023 17143 MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=3, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=3 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) Linux version 5.10.119 (5800X@crunchbot) (mipsel-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc (OpenWrt GCC 11.2.0 r19160+20-7ea2f3d6e2) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.37) #0 SMP Fri Jun 3 20:05:38 2022 Configuration Guide on EAP-TLS authentication for WPA-Enterprise (with FreeRADIUS) 09-27-2022 55978 After connecting the same AX200 client device to the TP-Link EAP615-Wall, I noticed that, while the throughput wasn’t as good at 5 feet, it did prove far more consistent up to 45 feet. At 70 feet (-87dB),I measured an average of 50.8Mbps upstream and 14.2Mbps downstream. Does that mean that using the Mediatek platform and a less powerful chip is better? It depends on the number of client devices. If you don’t connect that many compatible WiFi 6 devices, then you should see an overall better performance with the TP-Link EAP615-Wall. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615 – Wall – Signal Strength – 5GHz -80MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – UpstreamMtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=3, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=3, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) What's the difference between Master Administrator, Administrator and Viewer account in Omada Controller? 04-20-2023 16248

MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=6, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=6, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=1, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=1 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) Using the Omada controller to configure multiple SSIDs with different VLANs on TP-Link Omada EAPs and Switches to work with a non-Omada gateway(Multi-Net NAT supported) 06-08-2023 17522

Seamless Integrated into Omada SDN Platform

If you read the individual analysis of the TP-Link EAP610 and the EAP615-Wall, you know that I tested these two wireless access points in a very similar manner. The AP would be connected to a PoE switch (which powers it) and then I connected a server PC to the Ethernet switch as well. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615-Wall – Long-term speed test – 80MHz – Upstream – 5 feet. WtcSetMaxStaNum: MaxStaNum:129, BssidNum:16, WdsNum:0, MSTANum:0, MaxNumChipRept:0, MinMcastWcid:129

And that’s excellent news considering that the TP-Link EAP615-Wall may end up connecting to client devices from the older generation a lot more (due to being installed in potentially more industrial complexes). The Software MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=11, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=11, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) I have mentioned that the TP-Link EAP610 has gotten a smaller case which is excellent news especially since the heat management is still fairly decent and, no, there were no radical design changes, the case simply shrunk, while retaining the same look. So, we’re dealing with a 9.6 x 9.6 x 2.5 inches access point that has a metallic bottom and a plastic top, all covered by a white matte finish. But, when putting the TP-Link EAP610 and the EAP615-Wall next to each other, the latter is still more compact. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615-Wall – Ethernet ports Both the TP-Link EAP610 and the EAP615-Wall offer a stand-alone mode which is pretty much identical on both devices. And it’s not there just for status info, no, it does offer a fairly comprehensive set of options. So you’re not actually completely dependent on the manufacturer’s severs, such as the case of the EnGenius APs (for example, the ECW230S). To reach the Omada controller, I relied on the OC200 which I connected the PoE switch that powered both access points – the EAP615-Wall can also provide one of its Ethernet ports. The standalone GUI – Rogue AP Detection.

Important Notice

But, if you need to go above, let’s say, 20 client devices, the EAP610 should still be more stable. Switching to the WiFi 5 client devices, I noticed that, while there was a difference in terms of performance, it wasn’t that radical, well, up until reaching the 70 feet mark. That’s where the TP-Link EAP615-Wall either had an inconsistent performance or completely disconnected. Wireless Test (2.4GHz) This was installed as part of an Omada deployment for a campground guest WiFi network that was replacing aging/outdated Ubiquiti equipment. Coupled with outdoor WiFi 6 EAP610s, these indoor units were used in trailers and campers that had weak signal from the outdoor units. Overall, these are great APs for short range needs like single rooms and small areas and works just fine. However, there is an overall flaw with all Omada APs regarding guest networking that was confirmed by TP-Link engineers that is important to note.

The MU-MIMO is also present, as well as BeamForming, but I assume that what you’re most interested in is the mesh technology. The implementation on the TP-Link EAP610 allows you to use any unit as a mesh node or main AP, so you can roam between access points without noticing any disconnections. Obviously there is more to that because there’s also the path optimization and self-healing technique. But the TP-Link EAP615-Wall has been a bit weird in this regard. TP-Link OC200. That’s why you need to be aware that similarly to most other wall plate access points, there is a section with an Ethernet port that protrudes a little bit. This means that the Ethernet cable needs to come from junction box and into the access point, so you have a bit less freedom to where you can install the device than you would with other types of access points. That being said, is it possible to mount the TP-Link EAP615-Wall outdoors? The device has no IP rating and, even if there are no ventilation cut-outs, it was not built for outdoor conditions.As for WiFi, the access point uses the Mediatek MT7905DAN 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax 2×2:2 chip for the 5GHz radio band and the Mediatek MT7975DN 802.11b/g/n/ax 2×2:2 chipset for the 2.4GHz radio. Based on these specs, the TP-Link EAP610 should be more powerful than the EAP615-Wall, but the actual wireless tests may yet paint a different picture, especially in regard to the single client performance. Also, the extra RAM do matter if you intend to run additional applications, such as VPN. TP-Link EAP615-Wall Teardown. The Features IMPORTANT: To prevent upgrade failures, please read the following before proceeding with the upgrade process