Tusk

Product Information

Top 100 Albums". RPM. Vol.34, no.6. 20 December 1980. ISSN 0315-5994– via Library and Archives Canada. Aaron J. Hardek: Not gonna say I like it better than Rumours coz, well, Rumours is damn near perfect. But Tusk is very good. If I'd never heard Fleetwood Mac and someone introduced me to them by way of Tusk I would definitely be hooked. If I'd heard Tusk before Rumours I may just like it better. but having heard Rumours first... game over. The experimentation is a fresh move. Just about as perfect of a follow-up to Rumours as you can get. Waggoner, Nate (18 September 2013). "Fleetwood Mac's Tusk Is Everything That's Missing from Music Today". KQED . Retrieved 24 March 2019.

Bill Griffin: I appreciate that they didn't rehash the previous album and they are all fine musicians and singers but I just didn't hear anything that held my interest, certainly not anything that I hadn't already heard on the radio. That what I did hear on the radio didn't inspire me to explore the rest of the album is vindicated now that I have.Collis, Clark (April–May 2002). "Fleetwood Mac: Tusk". Blender. No.7. Archived from the original on 19 October 2006 . Retrieved 9 December 2017.

a b "American album certifications – Fleetwood Mac – Tusk". Recording Industry Association of America. I wasn’t the only person who dismissed “Tusk” at the time, and it seemed to be received as a disappointment – though what was a disappointment for Fleetwood Mac would have been a stunning accomplishment for anyone else. It was double platinum in the US, and reached number 4 on the album chart. Seven singles were released. “Tusk” was first and charted at number 8, which surprises me because honestly, I don’t remember it as a single at all. “Sara” was number 7, and that had huge staying power. The singles that followed didn’t do so well.Matrix / Runout (Side B runout (Ver.2)): P-5571W2 2HS-2-3350-EU F6[engraved] MASTERED BY CAPITOL M-A-11 I ヤ[engraved] Matrix / Runout (Runout A, variant 5, [13] and [ᴍᴀsᴛᴇʀᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴄᴀᴘɪᴛᴏʟ] - inverted): Kf 66 088-A 2HS-I-3350 EU F2 ᴍᴀsᴛᴇʀᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴄᴀᴘɪᴛᴏʟ 13 2 International Certifications" (PDF). Cash Box. 21 June 1980. p.40 . Retrieved 3 December 2021– via World Radio History.

Top 100 Albums". RPM. Vol.32, no.13. 22 December 1979. ISSN 0315-5994– via Library and Archives Canada. Billboard 200 Albums – Year-End 1980". Billboard. Archived from the original on 2 December 2020 . Retrieved 7 July 2022. I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall when Warner Bros. put that on in their boardroom and listened to it for the first time. [20] Oricon Album Chart Book: Complete Edition 1970–2005 (in Japanese). Roppongi, Tokyo: Oricon Entertainment. 2006. ISBN 4-87131-077-9.Finally, we may also share your Personal Information to comply with applicable laws and regulations, to respond to a subpoena, search warrant or other lawful request for information we receive, or to otherwise protect our rights. Walters, Barry (22 December 2015). "Tusk (Deluxe Edition)". Rolling Stone . Retrieved 9 December 2017. Further releases from the album " Not That Funny" (UK-only single release), " Think About Me", and " Sisters of the Moon" were slightly remixed for radio, and were less successful. The latter two appear in their 'single versions' on the 2002 compilation The Very Best of Fleetwood Mac, while "Sara", which was cut to 4 1⁄ 2 minutes for both the single and the first CD release of the album, appears in its unedited form on the 1988 Greatest Hits compilation, the 2002 release The Very Best of Fleetwood Mac, and the 2004 reissue of Tusk. [45] Stanley, Bob (7 March 2008). "How to lose 3 million fans in one easy step". The Guardian . Retrieved 10 January 2017.

The 10 Most Expensive Albums Ever Recorded". HowStuffWorks. 29 April 2016 . Retrieved 8 December 2022. Some of these are great but they don't fit to an album satisfying the fans of Rumours or the 1975 LP. Remember: You weren't able to skip the next song(s) in 1979, you had to turn the LP, so it took a bit of patience to hear the whole, pretty different material. And concerning the selling success Tusk had two handicaps: 1) it was a expensive double LP 2) without any #1 singles. Perhaps the decision to go for a double album was the flaw. You can create a decent (if not spectacular) 43 minutes out of Tusk and I can’t help but think a band without Rumours under their belt would have done exactly that. At 43 minutes you can see the wood between the trees and classics like Sara and Sisters Of The Moon get a chance to shine. This is my cut down version... your mileage may vary! Priore, Domenic (2005). Smile: The Story of Brian Wilson's Lost Masterpiece. Sanctuary. p.151. ISBN 1-86074-627-6. I realized today that by playing only my vinyl version for so long, I’ve forgotten about all the gems that are in the extended CD version, which are also deserving of a listen, basically making Tusk a four-disc set, and putting those extra sleeves to at least a virtual use.

Join In

This draw is conducted in a secure enivironment selecting an identifier which can not be used to access your account and the data is deleted as soon as the draw has been conducted. Brunner, Rob (18 April 2003). "Then Play On; Bare Trees; Fleetwood Mac; Rumours; Tusk; Time". Entertainment Weekly . Retrieved 2 November 2020. Reed, Ryan (11 October 2019). "Fleetwood Mac's 'Tusk': 10 Things You Didn't Know". Rolling Stone . Retrieved 12 October 2019. Salaverrie, Fernando (September 2005). Sólo éxitos: año a año, 1959–2002 (in Spanish) (1sted.). Madrid: Fundación Autor/SGAE. ISBN 84-8048-639-2. Christgau, Robert (31 December 1979). "Christgau's Consumer Guide". The Village Voice . Retrieved 17 July 2016.