ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM Gaming Monitor – 24.5 inch Full HD (1920x1080), 280Hz*, 0.5ms (GTG), Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400

£9.9
FREE Shipping

ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM Gaming Monitor – 24.5 inch Full HD (1920x1080), 280Hz*, 0.5ms (GTG), Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400

ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM Gaming Monitor – 24.5 inch Full HD (1920x1080), 280Hz*, 0.5ms (GTG), Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400

RRP: £99
Price: £9.9
£9.9 FREE Shipping

In stock

We accept the following payment methods

Description

Nélkülözhetetlen sütik Ezek elengedhetetlenek a weboldal és funkcióinak működéséhez, amelyek használatáról Ön dönt. Nélkülük nem működne a weboldalunk, például nem tudna bejelentkezni saját fiókjába, vagy bevásárlói listákat létrehozni. Személyre szabott hirdetések Ezeknek a sütiknek köszönhetően mi és partnereink az Ön vásárlásai, viselkedése és preferenciái alapján releváns és személyre szabott termékeket és szolgáltatásokat tudunk Önnek felkínálni. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM 27” HDR Monitor is a formidable addition to the gaming world, offering a blend of speed, immersion, and stunning visuals. While it excels in many areas, it has a few minor limitations worth considering.

ASUS TUF Gaming 24.5” 1080P HDR Monitor VG258QM - Full HD, 280Hz (Supports 144Hz), 0.5ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400, Speaker, DisplayPort HDMI, Height AdjustableThe pixel pitch shows the distance from the centers of two neighboring pixels. In displays, which have a native resolution (the TFT ones, for example), the pixel pitch depends on the resolution and the size of the screen. Approximate height of the display. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the height is calculated from the diagonal and the aspect ratio. Sometimes you want something that’s half TV, half monitor! Here are a selection of some really large format displays to consider. They aren’t really ideal as desktop monitors, being too big for comfortable up close work, but if you want something for gaming, consoles, movies and only light desktop work these are still good options Featured: LG 42C2 (2022) LG 42C3 (2023 model) (both reviewed) Harmadik féltől származó sütik Ezek a sütik harmadik féltől származó sütik, amelyekről és partnereinkről itt olvashat bővebben .

I don't have an Nvidia GPU so I don't know if you have to manually enable 10 bit after this, if you have an AMD card open the Radeon Software -> Display-> Color Depth and make sure that it's 10bit (if you want to use it for games go into Games -> Global Graphics -> Advanced -> ENABLE 10 bit Pixel Format. They tested at 280hz and the % inside the 3.57ms window is actually 100%, the amount of overshoot is just 8.6%( which is inflated by a single bad transition from 0 to 20) , which is actually quite good and barely noticeable both ingame and during motion testings.

24,5" ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM

Now take the best from OD60 and OD80 and you'll get OD120, it is something in between these two overdrives, the perfect sweet spot, there is no ghosting regardless of the speed of the ufo(I generally test at 1440pps to make sure that fast transitions are inside the 240hz window) and the amount of overshoot is noticeably lower than with OD80. I'm currently in the process of getting a Omen X25 since I want to compare the (reportedly) clearest 240hz TN on the market with this 390hz IPS. I tested 2x XL2546K units last year and I gotta say that although I wasn't impressed by unstrobed motion performance I still feel like I play better with TNs. DyAc/DyAc+ is Zowie's strobing technology, it basically fights off all or most of motion blur on the expense of strobe crosstalk artifacts (more or less visible for me depending on the game). I'd rather buy XL2546K instead of XL2546 right now (better panel, better tuned strobing supposedly). If you don't need strobing and still want a TN panel, I'd choose XL2540K or the upcoming ASUS.

Information about the number of pixels on the horizontal and vertical side of the screen. A higher resolution allows the display of a more detailed and of higher quality image. The maximum number of colors, which the display is able to reproduce, depends on the type of the panel in use and color enhancing technologies like FRC. Since the 2022 range, the C2 and C3 includes a far more sensible 42″ sized option making it more suitable as a cross-over monitor/TV and more comfortable for PC usage as well as movies and consoles. G-Sync and FreeSync Compatibility: This monitor supports both NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync technologies, reducing screen tearing and ensuring tear-free, stutter-free gaming.Analitikai sütik Ezek az Ön tevékenységeinek nyomon követésére szolgálnak adatelemzés céljából, mint például a reklámozás hatékonyságának értékelése, személyre szabott tartalom felajánlása./span> Key specs: 27″ OLED panel, 2560 x 1440 resolution, 240Hz refresh rate, adaptive-sync VRR, 1000 nits peak brightness

The firmware used for this guide is MCM104, newer products are shipped with MCM105, there are reports of early batches running MCM103, none knows the actual difference between these 3 firmwares and not a single firmware has been publicly released by Asus as of 17/08/2020 Can you update about the omen x 25? Im thinking of buying it because im looking for a monitor with the best motion clarity without ulmb, but i saw a couple of ppl complains that the monitor have massive input lag. My brother needed a new monitor and decided on this one. He wanted a 27" monitor because his old monitors where always small (22 inch or smaller). We debated between the smaller version of this monitor and the 1440p version due to Pixel Per Inch (PPI) concerns. We are aware of the concerns some people have about the low PPI of 1080p resolution on a 27" monitor but I think it boils down to personal preference. I have a 1440p 27" monitor so my brother was able to see the difference between the two resolutions and he says he has no desire to switch to a 1440p monitor after seeing the difference.

Hey Speancer, I'm currently in the process of returning my XL2546K because of too much inverse ghosting. (for some reason, on mine I can still see inverse ghosting even on AMA OFF and OD gain on 0). Did you experience the same problem on your XL2540K? And as a TN panel, the color accuracy and viewing angle are just ok, but are miles better than the vg248qe, and come great out of the box. I'm using the rtings settings with racing profile, 100r, 91g, 93b of the people running this monitor at 280hz already used OD80 because it was way clearer than OD60, the average overshoot of OD80 is 19.3% which is 2x more than OD120 and it affects 46% of transitions compared to 30% of OD120, but with 2 to 5 times higher overshoot levels in each transition. If the 8qm is supposed to have slower response times than the 9qm, how is it that the rtings motion test seems clearer on the 8qm? I want the cleanest motion clarity and that's supposed to be dictated by response times. Do TN's with slightly slower total response times, but faster rise and fall still offer cleaner motion clarity? This is a confusing result and goes against the "math", unless rise and fall times are more important than total response time for motion clarity. Rise and fall are lower on the TN compared to the IPS's lower total response time. Motion clarity is great, it can achieve the same clarity as the XL2546K with Dyac OFF but with absolutely no visible overshoot with Response Times set to lvl2, aside from the artifact aspect which does indicate that the Omen X 25 has better tuning, I don't see a massive difference in clarity.



  • Fruugo ID: 258392218-563234582
  • EAN: 764486781913
  • Sold by: Fruugo

Delivery & Returns

Fruugo

Address: UK
All products: Visit Fruugo Shop