TP-Link has unveiled the Archer AX53 IPv6 IPoE compliant Wi-Fi 6 router, which provides high-capacity connection without stress even amid congestion.

While there is a financial reason for the WiFi standard mismatch (laptops and PCs cost money), understand that we should be able to better simulate a home or office network when the client devices are more diverse. As for the server device, these are its specs: Again, only the WiFi 5 client devices went to 25Mbps, the others a bit below it, and the worst offender is once again the WiFi 6E PC which only reached 21.9Mbps. Surprisingly, we see that this client performed a bit better than when the test was run only with the 4K streaming simulation (perhaps we see some features finally starting up and helping the client a bit). TP-Link AX5400 AX73 – Multi-client stress test using 5 client devices – 4K streaming + simultaneous browsing (5GHz, 80MHz). The target throughput is 25Mbps. Multi-Client Stress Test – 2.4GHz Mumimo is something it has basically boils down to multiple antenna's can be used to focus on a device thats it.

Performance Comparison

The AX50’s wireless specifications meanwhile are promising, if not exceptional. Its 5GHz radio is rated at 2,402Mbits/sec with the use of 160MHz channels, and 4×4 MU-MIMO helps compatible clients maximise their transfer speeds. i just dont like mediatek ... want to avoid them.. and my reason to upgrade is not the speed,, its Wi-Fi6. OFDMA, QAM1024, or something.. these things.. altho i dont know what these things mean lol Apart from that, we’ve had tons of Zoom meetings and didn’t experience any instability or disconnections. To do so, I had to rely on a client device equipped with an AX200 WiFi adapter (TP-Link TX3000E) and on a server device that will be directly connected to the router (via an Ethernet cable). For the first test, I connected the client device to the 5GHz network (160MHz, OFDMA enabled) and, upstream, I measured an average of 938Mbps at 5 feet and 363Mbps at 30 feet.

With Archer AX55 and RE605X, I haven’t stumbled upon this problem and the smart connect feature seems to be able to connect all my devices around the house to the proper wireless channels accordingly.

Decent download speeds can’t hide the fact that rivals offer more

change device might be a costly task without gaining any specific advantage... less than being OCD compliant. Specs wise, the router is powered by a Dual Core CPU with 512MB RAM, Beamforming technology, High Power FEM, OFDMA, FEM, and also the latest WPA3. It’s also worth mentioning that I tried to keep the same distance between the client devices and the server (same as when testing the other wireless routers), but since distance means little, I decided to share the attenuation that was detected at the client level. The ZimaBoard 832 is positioned the farthest since it’s connected to a TV (it works as an alternative to the built-in computer) and the signal strength is -65dB, while the other four clients sit in the same room as the TP-Link AX5400 – the attenuation was -33dB for the WiFi 6E PC and it ranged between -38 and -43dB for the other three client devices. 4K and 1080p Streaming – 5 Client Devices Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. Read our editorial mission & see how we test. As for the processor. Its a router it literally can run whatever these all have a set end of life date no matter the chip in em sadly