The 35mm f1.4 will not be corrected with the built in lens profile correction. What you see is what you get. I am not really noticing any serious issues with Chromatic Aberrations. It’s all pretty standard and what you would expect with any modern lens design from an experienced company like Fujinon. Fujifilm unveils the latest development roadmap for interchangeable lenses for the X Series of mirrorless digital cameras

its tiny size and robust build quality, which gives you a reliable feeling even in bad weather conditions This phenomenon should technically increase the effects of focus falloff as it occurs along this boundary, this gives the image more depth with an almost 3 dimensional effect.Each lens is catered for different environments and different styles of shooting and one lens isn’t necessarily better than the other because they each provide a different set of features. In this comparison, I’ll go over the pros and cons of each lens to help you decide which lens is best for your style of shooting. A bokeh comparison between the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 can be found in the Lens Comparisons section of this review. X-Pro1 + XF35mmF1.4 R @ 35mm, ISO 400, 1/1400, f/2.0 Vignetting the 35mm focal length, which is the equivalent of 53mm – very close to the field of view of human eye Overall, the Fujinon 35mm f2 is faster at focusing and more reliable. When you’re dealing with slower or older cameras, like the X-T100 or the X-Pro2, you’ll notice this performance gap a lot more than with a new cameras like the X-T3. On the X-T3, I’m finding focus to be fast enough on the 35mm f1.4 for even the most hyper kids. This is an in-depth review of the Fujinon XF 35mm f/1.4 R prime lens that was released together with the Fuji X-Pro1 on September 21, 2011. Fuji specifically wanted to target professionals and enthusiasts with its X line, so it first introduced a professional-level mirrorless camera, the X-Pro1, along with three prime lenses: Fuji XF 18mm f/2, Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 and Fuji XF 60mm f/2.4 Macro. And hence, being part of the Fuji X mirrorless interchangeable lens system launch, the Fuji 35mm f/1.4 played a big role in the success of the product line.

its “glass-molded aspheric lens at the 5th element, which minimizes spherical aberration” and (that’s what my gut feeling is telling me) is responsible for this unique image character I was writing above This is the only lens I own, and I’m not sure that I’m missing out on much (maybe the 23mm 1.4…).Magic is a great word for it, but really it makes sense when you think about it – the in focus portion of your shot is fantastically sharp, and the fall-off and bokeh is like something out of a dream.The colors are absolutely fantastic. Some of the brilliant people at Fujifilm once said that with these lenses they considered how people remember images as much as how to make a technically excellent lens, and I think it shows with the 35mm f1.4.If you’re shooting pictures of people, nature, or still-life the lens is absolutely fantastic.I tried the 35mm f2, and while it’s a high quality, very sharp and snappy lens, the light and transition to the bokeh feel a little too “perfect” (clinical? formal?) for my taste.Great post! Mitakon is an interesting brand that’s gained some popularity with Fuji hobbyists in the past year. They offer affordable ultra-fast primes for the Fuji mount with some unique focal lengths. The catch? A sometimes-shoddy build quality and no auto-focus whatsoever — which ends up mattering a lot when you’re shooting wide open at f/.95. I have to agree that this test shows that the f/1.4 copy is terrible. It looks nothing like what my old one produced on a consistent basis. Though, the f/2 version isn’t extremely impressive. I shot a few of both while testing them at a camera shop, inside and outside as well. The thing is, the f/1.4 IS definitely sharper (if only slightly) than the f/2 version from f/2 on up. Slight, but noticeable. Even with the ‘paper specs’ being different, the f/1.4 only loses in the autofocus department, and softness in the corners (which, for a lens with this sort of aperture is expected anyway.)The XF35mmF1.4 R moves all of the lens groups at the same time, it is the simplest and best way to ensure the best image quality. By using this method, the lens achieves superb results from the centre to the edges and creamy bokeh that is uniform even when shooting close-ups or subjects at a distance. Images wide open at f/1.4 really surprised me. They are sharp, possibly even sharper than the 16mm f/1.4. This isn’t a technical review so that might not even be true but it’s just the look it gives off.

I even use it for food photography as well as I like the way it brings out the texture and colour of food. And with the F/1.4 maximum aperture lets in enough light in dimly-like restaurants and adds beautiful bokeh to dishes. You need to get closer to your subject. As with every wide-angle lens, you usually need to get closer to get the framing that you want.It’s built square to preserve space and keep everything compact. However, it does not fit comfortably onto the lens, and the rubber cap that attaches the hood to the lens does not fit snuggly and can fall off. You might occasionally get flare with the Fuji 35mm f/1.4 lens when shooting into direct light sources, such as the sun or a strong light source. However, most photographers report minimal flare with this lens, making it an excellent option for most shooting conditions and lighting situations. If you are concerned about potential flare issues with the Fuji 35mm f/1.4, you may want to consider using a lens hood or other flare prevention techniques, such as shooting from different angles. Is the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 Sharp? Best Fuji Lenses for Portrait: Buying Guide – A rundown of the top lenses tailor-made to deliver perfect portraits. If you if you stress test it each lens you can find some CA, but in daily photos it’s pretty much non-existent. The Fuji 35mm f/1.4 has two rings on the lens barrel – a focusing ring on the front of the barrel, and an aperture ring close to the mount of the lens. Since the Fuji X system uses a fly-by-wire system, which means that the focus ring is not mechanically tied to any of the lens elements, but rather controlled electronically, there is no focus scale on the lens and the ring will rotate in either direction without any hard stops or extra resistance.

Here’s a comparison between those two. 23mm f2 vs 35mm f2: Which of Fuji’s weather resistant primes is better? Ultimately – no lens is perfect. No lens has everything you could ever want. There are always sacrifices — if it’s not image quality, it’s weight. If it’s not weight, it’s flexibility. Tradeoffs abound! It’s always hard to talk about autofocus in a written review, the best I can do is talk about personal experience because the AF capabilities changes depending on what camera you’re using.

Of course, the most important thing to consider when buying a new lens is the image quality. It can be light and beautifully constructed, but if the distortion is off and the focus all wrong, it’s not a good lens or worth your cash. So, let’s look at the image quality of the Fuji 35mm f/1.4 lens. Fuji 35mm f1.4 Review Sharpness and distortion Sharpness is poor even at the center of the image frame when shooting at apertures wider than f/2.8, and edge-sharpness doesn’t get into its stride until f/5.6. Sharpness across the whole frame is best at f/5.6 and f/8. We use Imatest SFR (spatial frequency response) charts and analysis software to plot lens resolution at the center of the image frame, corners and mid-point distances, across the range of aperture settings and, with zoom lenses, at four different focal lengths. The tests also measure distortion and color fringing (chromatic aberration). The Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R lens boasts a metal mount, high-grade metal barrel and non-rotating 52mm filter thread. The focus ring is generously wide, smooth in action without being loose, and has a ridged, rubberised grip band. There are “hard stops” at either end of the 28cm-infinity focus range.