The Seagate BarraCuda is a typical hard drive that's built and optimized for capacity and lower pricing over performance. As such, it offers plenty of storage space at an inexpensive price point, but it has serious limitations. The product line is limited to 8TB and uses slower SMR technology at every capacity point, restricting the drives' use because write performance and consistency are quite poor, while the competing 8TB WD Blue uses faster CMR tech. The BarraCuda's overall performance is also low. This is partly due to the 5400-RPM spindle speed, but the lower rotational speed is forgivable given the price point. Photo/video editing ? maybe, if youre an individual wanting to save some money. But time = money if it's your job, a bunch of 4TB SSD would fare better on long term. A very tiny indie game developer. He also loves to play games, read fiction, watch shows and anime. He is a tech enthusiast currently pursuing Engineering who likes to write. Read There's also a scheme (known as the T10 Data Integrity Field (DIF)) for doing host-based error correction that exposes sectors as 520 bytes, instead of 512. Most enterprise drives support this. The extra bits are meant to hold ECC. Yes, gaming isn't the preferred use case for this class of hard drives, but we include these tests for perspective. Built for gamers, 3DMark’s Storage Benchmark focuses on real-world gaming performance. Each round in this benchmark stresses storage based on gaming activities, including loading games, saving progress, installing game files, and recording gameplay video streams.

Taking a closer look at the Seagate BarraCuda Compute hard drive, we found out that the drive uses what is known as the Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) technology. This is one of the considerably newer technology in the realm of hard drive, which allows more data to be kept within the same size of a physical hard drive. This technology allows us to see single hard drives that goes beyond the 10TB capacity these days. The Seagate Barracuda Compute features a SATA 6Gbps interfaceThe Seagate BarraCuda branding has been around for almost three decades. It was the first hard drive that featured 7200RPM speed, which provided superior performance over competition, allowing Seagate to gain its spot as one of the top manufacturers of hard drives. File server ? hey maybe for a small business, but how do they fare in RAID ? does the SSD cache gets in the way ? Analitikai sütik Ezek az Ön tevékenységeinek nyomon követésére szolgálnak adatelemzés céljából, mint például a reklámozás hatékonyságának értékelése, személyre szabott tartalom felajánlása./span> Are there better drives on the market? - sure, probably almost all. But - in my case - they were all fairly more expensive (e.g. the 6TB Blue was 30% more expensive than the 8TB Barracuda).

The Tech Revolutionist was established in 2012 to bring the latest news from the PC DIY scene to the readers in Singapore. We have now expanded into many other areas in technology, covering a wide scope of topics from lifestyle consumer to enterprise products.I've recently bought one of this drives and while I haven't installed it yet on its final (new) system, I copied a few thousand files (800GB or so of data) to it from an old system. In contrast, Seagate’s 7200-RPM FireCuda is the better choice if you want a more robust three-year warranty with data recovery services. The FireCuda is also faster due to its CMR tech and faster spindle speed, earning top billing on our list of best hard drives. However, this extra performance comes at a significantly higher price per TB, leaving the BarraCuda as a somewhat niche product.

Built for gamers, 3DMark’s Storage Benchmark focuses on real-world gaming performance. Each round in this benchmark stresses storage based on gaming activities, including loading games, saving progress, installing game files, and recording gameplay video streams. It performed well enough, with no discernable noise - it seems to be a decent drive for its purposes: occasional archival of files (e.g. fotos, videos) where speed (write and read) is of little concern. For all the rest I have a couple of NVMEs. Seagate doesn’t complicate this model, so it’s only available at 4TB and 8TB, which is fine as these are the two most popular capacities for desktop PCs. However, these capacities can be limiting, so you will have to reach for the IronWolf series to get better density. Even though the Seagate Barracuda internal hard disk has a rotation speed of only 5400 which is on the low spectrum of hard drive speeds, it has other features embedded in it which make up for it. It has a data transfer rate of 190 megabytes per second (190MB/s) and load/unload cycle rate of 300,000. Those are very good speeds considering the rotation speed of the hard disk.

Some people say when you write a bigger amount – for instance over 100 GB – that the writing performance is sinking drastically to under 1-2 MByte/s. Seagate Barracuda 8TB 3.5-inch Internal Hard Drive is a very versatile internal storage option for all your desktop needs. It comes with a comfortable compatible size and can fit in all cases so you don’t have to worry about its dimensions. The 8 terabytes of storage are enough for every general-purpose user. It might even be over the top for most of the people out there. Based on the Roadkil’s Disk Speed test, we saw the access time of the hard drive to be of 11.38ms. As the drive is of 5400RPM, the access time is also usually longer than faster 7200RPM drives. Regardless, Seagate did clearly state that the drive is rated at a read speed of 190MB/s based on the specifications sheet. So you will be clear on what are you getting before actually purchasing the drive. It’s tempting to spend a little more cash to buy up to Seagate’s 7200-RPM FireCuda, which is better across the board. It has a faster spindle speed that provides better sequential and random performance.

With the work from home arrangements made default due to the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, many users started to find out that their computing setup at home is insufficient. While you also consume more entertainment and media content at home, you will start to realize that your main storage drive (usually an SSD) on your PC simply can’t hold that much data. Furthermore, a SSD’s performance will deteriorate when it is almost full. Therefore, it is usually not recommended for you to store too much files on your SSD. Gaming ? maybe but you would know that it's not an ideal solution and would want to upgrade to an SSD eventually because of the eventual stuttering. The FireCuda's sequential performance in Crystal Disk Mark is as expected, and its 4KB write latency is surprisingly good. However, the 4KB random read latency is below average. The FireCuda still beats the Blue and BarraCuda HDDs but doesn't compare as well against WD’s OptiNAND technology in the Red Pro, which is an acceptable tradeoff given the FireCuda's much lower price point. Sustained Write Performance Regarding sector sizes, there's a similar tradeoff for RAIDs. You have to decide the granularity at which you want to spread data across the different drives. I think the current RAID I have is using a 64 kiB chunk size (stripe size = num_logical_drives * chunk_size), which that first graph I quoted shows to be a safe choice for maximum throughput. However, the tradeoff isn't about speed vs. space-efficiency, but rather what I/O size you want to optimize for. If you make your stripes too large (or too small) for your typical I/O size, then it's just your performance that suffers. Nem személyre szabott hirdetések Ezek a sütik lehetővé teszik számunkra, hogy általános termék- és szolgáltatásreklámokat jelenítsünk meg Önnek.To meet this increasing demand of digital files storage needs, it is sensible to add new large capacity hard drives to your computer system. Hard drives usually come in much larger capacities as compared to SSDs, and are more affordable if storage capacity is what you are looking out for. However, it is known that hard drives just simply don’t perform as fast as SSDs. The role of hard drives has switched from the primary disk solution to a data archival medium these days. In this case, the Seagate BarraCuda Compute 8TB features 256MB of disk cache. Moreover, the Seagate BarraCuda Compute 8TB only rotates at a 5400RPM speed. This is suitable for a NAS that uses ZFS in any configuration-be it a mirror or a RAID config (thanks CMR!), local storage that is sensitive to network latency but not high bandwidth, archiving that has large changes regularly that SMR will choke on or perhaps a drive for storing games (since this is a gaming brand of Seagate's) that weren't designed for SSDs or aimed at an older game collection. I think 2 of them in raid1 for a file server would be a good solution for a Small Business's file server. The BarraCuda also has a workload rate limit (WRL) that defines how much data you can read and write from the drive before reliability degrades, but it’s quite low at 55TB per year during the two-year warranty period. In contrast, the 8TB WD Blue has no workload restriction.