Also, there are actually some politicians that would go toe-to-toe with Frank Underwood from House of Cards; there are also more who are upright, hardworking and enthusiastic to serve their own country. Although, their age, race, sex and wealth might not be representative of the country at large, however, it isn’t essentially their fault. The problem is far deeper in the organization and culture of the Parliament itself. is this how politics is done everywhere or do some countries do it better? If so, who? And do not say SWEDEN or I will bite you. There are no comparisons so for all the reader knows Britain is doing politics much better than anywhere! It might be rubbish but you should see the others!

Why We Get the Wrong Politicians is a vital and compelling read Why We Get the Wrong Politicians is a vital and compelling read

In theory, it works perfectly. When a bill is first issued by the government, it undergoes two readings in the House of Commons. However, the first reading is just a formality where the minister reveals the bill. It is only in the second reading that MPs have the opportunity to debate the law. These debates are majorly on the bill’s principles instead of discussing its details.the extent to which casework takes up large amounts of an MP's time, hence reducing the time they can spend actually doing their main job of passing & scrutinising legislation We’ve already seen how Britain’s ineffective political structure poisons good lawmaking. But this toxicity inevitably seeps out and infects the political culture too – like a leaky septic tank poisoning the groundwater.

Why We Get the Wrong Politicians by Isabel Hardman | Goodreads

One of the UK's stars in political journalism asks why we lost faith in politicians - and how we can fix our system of government Various chapters on the performance of recent parliaments are full of their failures, but silent with regard to any achievements. That our current tranche of politicians, of whatever party, are “wrong” (inference: politicians are a bad lot in general); the ridiculous cost & time investment of becoming an MP (obviously limiting the pool of those that can & will apply) In the UK, elected politicians on the national level are called Members of Parliament (MPs), who represent a local area, called a constituency. Every political party nominates an MP candidate for each constituency, and local residents vote for their preferred candidate to represent them in the lower house of Parliament, known as the House of Commons. The party with the most MPs in the House of Commons becomes the governing party.By doing this, a process meant to examine and debate legislation becomes a party loyalty competition. Britain’s political structure support members of the committee phase to become biased puppets and not objective lawmakers. We get the wrong politicians because many of the right people cannot financially afford to run and are deterred from running for parliament by aspects of the job and the prejudices of what Hardman refers to as the ‘Westminster bubble’. Hardman focuses on people in the first section, giving an account of political life that runs from getting into parliament to leaving it. Their issues start once they are elected. The Parliament is located in The Palace of Westminster which is an extensive tangle of tiny offices, long corridors, conference rooms’ and a lot of restaurants as well as bars. MPs mostly complain of being lost and confused for weeks after being elected into office.

Why We Get the Wrong Politicians: Shortlisted for the

Get ready because we are going into details about some malicious and often neglected British government’s aspects. From the MP selection process to their early resignations and we will also learn about why the system is crumbled and what can be done to resolve it. Siren voices are calling for a second referendum – the first asked the question “do you want to leave the EU?” – it was a yes/no thing, and was won by the leavers 52% to 48%. It did not ask HOW you want to leave, & that has been the big problem. There are many ways to leave, it turns out! But other people say – are you crazy? That would only postpose our terminal confusion! As those who read her in the Spectator or listen to Radio 4’s The Week in Westminster will know, Hardman is a consummate insider with high-level access—here she draws from her interviews with David Cameron, for example. And so it comes as no surprise that she takes a rather more charitable view towards MPs than the book’s title might suggest. Having spent years as a lobby journalist, she has a degree of sympathy with our political masters. Worse than this are the areas she highlights that get no thought and no legislation, such as the woeful state of policy about temporary accommodation for people awaiting housing. Hardman manages to enter the debate thoughtfully and without a partisan air. She provides detailed yet readable scrutiny of these policies and their outcomes, and exemplifies how a cool head with an understanding for a topic might offer useful critique – something that, glaringly, did not happen before these policies were left to detrimentally affect millions of lives. This leads to an appreciation, at a personal level, for politicians, but severe disappointment at their achievements. Her conclusions are pithy, and largely damning, she writes the political career “is characterised by dysfunction, from the selection process that decides who our potential MPs will be, to the way MPs don’t scrutinise laws at all”.Perhaps that power-hungry personality is inherited. “My father put a mark on me, like I was part of the Bokassa brand,” Marie-France told me. “Bokassa — it’s a name that is powerful,” she said with a grin. “I wouldn’t want to change it.” Even though the whole structure of Parliament does contribute to legislating lax, there is a device in the Westminster that is certainly a driver for good which is known as select committees. That the author knows why this is (inference: some potentially fraudulent transactional relationship between politicians and the public, hence the “we” in the title).