Overall, no one will be disappointed with this chip's performance, however pretty much everything else is a better option, I am overall happy with the chip however I do have some buyers remorse as the alternatives either, perform better or cost less and potentially in the case of the 7800X3D - both! While a higher TDP usually relates to higher performance, the inclusion of the added 3D V-cache means that the processor can access a larger pool of superfast cache memory, which is even more useful when gaming than just throwing raw power at the problem. With its own dedicated extra cache, there are fewer fetch operations to the PC's main memory, so the chip runs more efficiently, and potentially cooler under load. Based on our evaluation, the 7900X3D's 5.6 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler. I wonder how the upcoming single-CCD 7800X3D will perform. I like that it's a single-CCD CPU vs the dual-CCD in the 7950/7900X3D. If it can boost to 5.6GHz, despite the official boost rating only showing 5.0GHz, then that could potentially be the best of both worlds (gaming & application, when app not limited by # of cores).

We’ll be breaking down exactly what these differences mean in terms of performance later on in this article. In conclusion, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 9 7900X3D are both excellent CPUs with impressive specs and performance. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great option for gamers who want high performance at a more affordable price point, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D is geared more towards professional users who need even more power for demanding tasks.The Insanely Powerful Gaming and Streaming Desktop Processor, with AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technology for Even More Game Performance 1 Based on multiple public benchmarks, it is clear that the Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in both single-core and multi-core tasks. In the many single-core tests, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D has scored over 2185, which is 3% higher than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of about 2127. However, in the multi-core tests, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had a significantly higher score of 33192, which is 45% higher than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of 22856. So how do these differences translate into performance? We’ve broken it all down for you below. Ryzen 9 7900X vs 7900X3D – Performance As you can see, when we put these two powerhouses head to head we see identical core and thread counts but not much else stays the same. Perhaps the standout difference is the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s gigantic cache size, which comes into being thanks to its X3D technology.

We do not charge you a fee for our services. We may receive commission from Novuna Personal Finance based on an agreed percentage of the amount you borrow. In terms of core and thread count, both CPUs have 12 cores and 24 threads, which means they are both capable of handling demanding workloads such as video editing, 3D modeling, and other productivity tasks. Opening with the flagship SKU, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D shares many of the same characteristics as the Ryzen 9 7900X, including 16-cores and 32-threads and a turbo frequency of up to 5.7 GHz. The enhanced chip offers 128MB of L3 cache, which is comprised of 64 MB of existing pooled L3 cache in the CCDs, and another 64 MB sliced on top with TSVs (presumably placing 64MB on one CCD, creating an unbalanced cache). Curiously, the official TDP is also much lower, with the chip rated at 120 W versus 170 W for the regular 7950X. Consequently, the 7950X3D has a lower base core frequency of 4.2 GHz, versus 4.5 GHz. Although the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a 300 MHz slower base frequency, having the same turbo frequency of 5.7 GHz means that peak performance can be similar, though in heavily multithreaded situations the lower TDP is undoubtedly going to come into play. AMD Ryzen 7000X/X3D Series Line-UpIn recent benchmarks, we have observed that the 7900X3D produces results that are closer to those of the Intel i9-13900K, thereby reducing the gap that existed between the two processors in this range. With such comparable performance, AMD users can look forward to a brighter future in this 7000 series generation. Furthermore, AMD has regained its title as the best gaming CPU in the market, edging out Intel once again. Ryzen 7900X3D: Conclusion These workloads are comprised of a fixed amount of work, so we can plot the task energy against the time required to finish the job (bottom axis), thus generating a really useful power chart. AMD claimed that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D would show an improvement ranging from 4% to 52% in terms of productivity, but in our benchmarks, the CPU wasn’t hitting those amazing heights. Still, it held its ground against the non-3D chip, but both are defeated by Intel’s Core i9-13900K in almost every test. The much-anticipated Ryzen 9 7900X3D was first unveiled only recently amid CES 2023, wherein some of the most mind-bending new technologies gain traction and become icons in the fold. As for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D release date, little was known until now.

The announcement from AMD of their Ryzen 7000 X3D lineup was one of the most exciting of CES 2023. These 3 CPUs all make use of the new Ryzen X3D technology which allows for significantly higher cache sizes. The 7900X3D is the middle child of the range and we are already almost able to get our hands on this sleek new CPU that is released sometime today.One important similarity the two CPUs share is their Zen 4 architecture. Zen 4 is incredibly powerful and capable of processing far more instruction per cycle than the previous Zen 3. It also made significant steps forwards in terms of energy efficiency, a step which perhaps proves vital to improving the performance of these two CPUs considering how power-hungry they both are. No doubt the 7800X3D will be popular, and releasing six weeks after the two Ryzen 9 processors may allow the top-tier to stretch their legs a little. But a lot will depend on performance, especially given the ongoing battle between Zen 4 and Intel’s Raptor Lake processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Intel Core i9-13900K are undoubtedly two of the best processors you can buy, but they aren't equal. We threw both of the CPUs on the test bench to answer the age-old question: is AMD or Intel better? As with the original 5800X3D, AMD is aiming these chips at gamers in particular, as the complex, heavy-dataset nature of video games means they often benefit from having additional L3 cache on-hand. The 5800X3D was, depending on the game, around 15% faster than its vanilla Ryzen counterpart – at least so long as it wasn’t GPU limited. AMD is being a bit more coy this time around on making apples-to-apples comparisons against their regular Ryzen 7000 chips, so for now the only official performance figures available from AMD are pitting the chips against the 5800X3D. In lieu of that, a 15% improvement is a reasonable baseline given that the cache sizes haven’t changed in the last generation, but we’ll definitely want to take a closer look at the final chips to see if the additional L3 cache is as beneficial to Zen 4 as it was for Zen 3. In raw performance, there isn’t a single title where the 3D V-Cache doesn’t beat its non-3D predecessor. Some wins are larger than others, but it shows an improvement in every test. Which CPU is the best of them all? Jacob Roach / Digital Trends