The EM10 III in fact has the processor from the EM1 II, so that's a significant difference, even if the sensor remains the same. Like the Mark II before it though, the EM10 Mark III feels a lot more solid and comfortable than you’d expect for a camera of its size and mid-range positioning. There’s no formal weather-sealing nor tough credentials at this price, but the EM10 Mark III’s build quality feels very solid, dense and reassuring in your hands, and the slightly enlarged grip allows you to hold it securely and comfortably. It offers a versatile focal range that covers everything from landscapes to portraits. Plus, given the super compact size of this camera/lens combo, it makes for an ideal travel companion. It will capture quality shots without attracting too much attention, so it’s also ideal if you enjoy capturing more candid imagery. If you prefer to compose with a screen, the EM10 Mark III offers the same 3in / 3:2 shaped LCD panel as the Mark II that’s touch-sensitive and can angle vertically upwards by about 90 degrees or down by about 45 degrees. This vertical tilt is useful for framing at high or low angles in the landscape orientation, but won’t help you if you’re shooting in the portrait / vertical orientation. It’s also unable to flip forward to face the subject, making it much harder to frame selfies or filming pieces to camera; it’s a shame since the movie stabilisation is otherwise ideal for handheld vlogging. If you want a screen that can flip out to the side, angle for portrait or landscape orientation, or face the subject, consider either Panasonic’s Lumix G80 / G85 or the higher-end Olympus OMD EM5 Mark II. The E-M10 Mark II provide EFC, like the E-M10 version I, but also a full electronic shutter which is totally silent and vibration free with a speed up to 1/16000s. It looks like you did not read the manual carefully enough...

Olympus rumors 2023 - Camera rumors in 2023 | Digital Camera Olympus rumors 2023 - Camera rumors in 2023 | Digital Camera

It kind of does. Olumpus had some things developed for a future model - which won't happen, so they could have decided to "flush" whatever is in the pipeline and launch a minor refresh. So for me, it's come down to OM-D E-M10 vs the Fuji X-E2. The main thing I'm hung up on right now is the noise at high ISOs. I want this to be somewhat of a DSLR replacement for traveling, and I'm concerned about the camera's abilities in low light. I'm using an old D200 right now, which for me, maxes out around ISO 400. If we had any criticisms, it would be that we’d love to see a mic port to go along with the 4K video capabilities and flip down screen. However, this would likely start to step on the toes of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 line, so we can understand why Olympus didn’t include this on their entry-level camera. X-trans hasn't been a problem in years. And especially not for beginners. If anything, it is an advantage. I don't really understand why do people still bring up X-trans as being problematic. The inability to program the L-FN on lenses that have this button (the 12-50/12-40 cannot be fully utilised on this body)

Main Rivals

Again it is a choice. You'll get better image quality with D810 and a 600mm lens but EM1 II and 300mm f4 is quite a bit smaller and lighter. Another good option is Nikon D500 and 300mm f4 VR and 1.4x teleconverter. I wanted to refresh myself about the details of what was lost, control-wise, between the EM10ii and iii, so came here to DPR. ozturert: I don't see a large difference between 4/3 and micro 4/3 lens size, but if compactness is the goal, sure smaller is better. ;-) Thanks, I know there is similar (and more expensive, Oz for example) pricing elsewhere, but do they think we can't see the huge differences?!

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Micro Four Thirds System Camera Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Micro Four Thirds System Camera

The E-M10 Mark IV is powered by a TruePic VIII imaging processor, which works to deliver reduced noise in images captured in low light and has a native ISO sensitivity range of ISO 200-6400. This can be expanded to ISO 80 (LO) and ISO 25,600 (HI), but you’d be wiser to take advantage of the camera’s quality five-axis in-body image stabilization system (IBIS) before you crank the ISO up to those numbers. OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIs. Catchy and memorable little name. Pretty soon microchanges like this will have subscripts or superscripts, or similar silliness.Even if you’re shooting subjects that aren’t keeping still though, the stabilisation remains very useful for keeping the image steady as you compose. Even with mid-length telephoto lenses, the image floats eerily on the screen or in the viewfinder, allowing you to very accurately compose without any visible wobbling. And the fonctional difference was in the firmware only (along with a small cosmetic difference). One can upgrade a Stylus 1 with the Stylus 1s firmware (I did it).

Bang for the Buck: Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Review Bang for the Buck: Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Review

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a fantastic little camera with plenty to offer. With a new 20MP sensor and improved Continuous Autofocus, the Mark IV boasts some useful upgrades over its predecessor, the Mark III. While the other improvements are admittedly incremental, we’re still impressed with what the Mark IV brings to the table. It is, though, a different story for stills. We were really impressed with this camera's basic kit lens – its 14-42mm pancake lens option is a fantastic starting place for someone upgrading from a phone. The 3.0-inch LCD touchscreen is the most ambitious of the series so far. This time, the E-M10 IV’s screen tilts upwards 90-degrees for shooting at hip level, and also flips downwards 180-degrees in the other direction. This positions it under the camera for selfies and vlogging. It’s good to see more flexibility introduced, but it does present a potential issue for people who want to self-shoot while using the camera on a tripod. To be clearer, in case you're not fully versed in the subject, Olympus has two very different EFC implementations of EFC across their bodies depending on age and price. Most newer or pricier bodies (as alluded to above) have a straightforward EFC where you have an electronic curtain followed by a mechanicalThe point is that smartphones are getting much better every iteration while cameras are taking far longer for every incremental update. The E-M10 doesn't have all the enthusiast trimmings of the E-M1, but it is targeted to a slightly more serious or developing photographer, rather than a casual snapshooter. With a built-in viewfinder, dual control wheels and number of customizable controls, it's aimed for the photographer who wants to take some control over shooting settings, though it does have an Auto mode for shooters not yet ready to take that step. It presents all of the light-and-compact benefits of Micro Four Thirds, with a few more SLR-like touches (viewfinder and direct controls) that an enthusiast will appreciate. But if you’re a keen photographer and can afford a little more, the new OM-D E-M5 Mark III is simply stellar. It has a higher resolution 20-megapixel sensor, faster and more advanced autofocus, superb in-body stabilization and terrific high speed shooting modes.