Knowing that, I would probably argue that it seems the one box was a bad batch, and another should be tested since the majority of the small sample (2 out 3 boxes), had 0 issues. The trick is to completely redesign the mantle layer located right under the cover, or so we're told.

having played just about every ball out there I would say the ProV1 is diffidently the best but it does not improve my game. At least now I understand why I experienced so much variation in performance with the Chrome Soft over the last two years.Compared to Chrome Soft 20, the Chrome Soft 22 is longer through the bag while retaining its signature soft feel. Also, the Chrome Soft X 2020 boasts a single-core mantle, compared to the standard variant, which employs a dual-core thing. I hadn’t seen the comment on the sample size – I think my comment was posted before Tony made clarified that point. Extremely durable, resilient, and thinner cover material increases ball speed and creates lower spin on full shots, while maintaining high spin and control around the green. It’s the reason why the new ball will be available in White, Red/White Truvis, Yellow/Black Truvis, White Triple Track, and Yellow Triple Track.

Never would have been interested in these balls but found a Truvis one day and began using it just because I was interested in the Truvis design. You can’t go to the hundredths place when the actual number could be anywhere from 4% and 29% with such a low sample size. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.The remaining 40% should split relatively evenly between higher-spinning and lower-spinning variants. If you take a look at the Golf Monthly YouTube channel, you'll see his equipment videos dating back over a decade! Well that may be true, which would say they have no problem still selling a bad/inferior product, just like before. Softer than “tour” models like the Titleist ProV1 or Bridgestone Tour B330, to our hands, yet firmer than the ultra-low compression likes of the Wilson Staff Zip. No matter what the spec of the ball is supposed to be, if it can’t be delivered consistently than, much like mamma’s box of chocolates, you don’t actually know what you’re going to get (from one ball to the next).

Example -” While we found some measure of off-center cores in just over 20 percent of our samples, only one was significantly off-center to the degree that it would likely have performance implications. I even cracked one and that hasn’t happened since 40 years ago playing an ancient Topflite in 35 degree weather as a kid.

Without those measurements, taken in a controlled setting, your ball lab consistency data doesn’t mean much to the average consumer. If I had a few dozen I intended to play, I suggest testing for the off center scores (salt brine or one of those spin balancer dohickies) and just play the good balls. Company head office address: GOLFONLINE, WOODFIELD HOUSE, 506-508 HONEYPOT LANE, STANMORE, MIDDLESEX, HA7 1JS, U. At least they’re trying to fix the problem, but should have fessed up to their mistake and at least offer a refund publicly. The ball would hit the green and spin almost 10-15 feet back with a couple of them spinning back off the green on front pins.