Plus we review lenses all the time and it is good to be able to compare it in the future – again not super practical or cost saving but it is what it is.

Furthermore, with an emphasis given to the elimination of axial chromatic aberration, Sigma says users can expect sharp images with no colour fringing, even wide-open at f/1. The main exception is the lack of built-in Vibration Reduction, although the very fast maximum aperture of f/1. This is even more impressive when you consider how massive the Sigma’s predecessor was ( Sigma 85mm f1.For photographers who need advanced photo editing options, Pixelmator Pro for macOS offers layer-based editing, machine learning-powered adjustment and selection tools, and features such as Denoise and Super Resolution. On the risk of comparing apples and oranges, what is your take about this lens compared to the GM 50/1. Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear.

We tested focus both in still and video (including the touch feature on the monitor of our A7R IV) and we can’t really see any advantage for the Sony.Around the lens mount a rubber gasket can be found, Sigma claims the lens to be dust and weather proof. but the tests in this topic are more about bokeh and the rendering of the lights, the sharpness was simply just not neccessary. This feature is a game-changer if you are shooting in manual mode and your object is darting between lighter and darker spots. Stopped down, vignetting is still a little over 1 EV in the extreme corners, some other 85mm lenses like the 1. Both lenses come in Sony E mount (Full Frame coverage) with the Sigma having an L-mount version as well.

com,"Compare axial/spherical/spherochromatism performance and the Otus comes out on top, followed by the Milvus with the Sigma trailing these other two lens. The construction of the barrel is a blend of precision-engineered metal and thermally stable composite (TSC), with its rubberised focus ring offering excellent precision and fluidity when focusing manually. The Sony has better contrast - the edges are better defined, so it has better acutance than the Sigma.Sigma Art lenses have sometimes exhibited a faint warm color cast to them, but if there is such an issue present with this mirrorless 85mm, it is either negligible and/or pleasing and actually beneficial to the overall character of the images. In some cases, when I use this lens for night time street photography, I would love to have less pincushion distortion. DG HSM for Sony E-Mount lens, Sigma employed an iris diaphragm with 9 rounded blades, which has resulted in very nice bokeh in our view. lens is a great choice for portraits, or for when you need to record video in low-light, does this lens do enough to make it a great lens for video?