These CB6000/s cages are great entry level devices to anyone wanting to start playing with chastity. Whilst they do cost a fair amount, the price is usually less than a custom metal cage device, and certainly less than full belts. Whilst many other competitors have arrived in the market offering similar devices made of poly-carbonate, silicon and other substances, the products from ALE tend to be more well known and have good support from the manufacturer. Like anything you buy, you have to be happy with the product and for the price, I am happy. My only word of caution is to be wary of counterfeit devices which seem to be flooding the market. They may appear to be the same and function the same, there is always the possibility of a problem with the construction or the quality and composition of the materials used. The Nano is a durable, good-looking device that shouldn’t cause most guys any trouble at all, even those entirely new to wearing chastity devices. If I weren’t so sold on the look and feel of stainless steel devices, I could easily make the Holy Trainer Nano my regular device without a second thought. Plastic alternatives are available too, if you’re a puny wimp who doesn’t take genital self-mutilation seriously; a sad little weasel unwilling – or, let’s face it, unable – to put in the hard miles on the highway to self-denial. Inside you'll also find five rings of different sizes, so that the cage fits the penis and scrotum as well as possible.

Holy Trainer device tubes offer a generously sized urination outlet. That made me hopeful I might be able to pee normally while standing. The first couple of times I tried it, it worked like a champ. But flaccid penises are always in a constant state of flux, expanding and contracting.

Rings and spacers: both devices use the same rings and spacers but I have noticed that there seems to be some variation in the quality of the castings. Some parts have definite seams that you can feel and which could cause comfort problems. If concerned, a little sanding with some wet and dry sandpaper could solve the issues. Is the comfort ring that "Stainless Steel Ring fopr all CB's" whichis wleded to the rear edge of the tube? The CB6000 cage seems more prevalent, at least in my case, to breakage. I put this down to the fact that given the length of the cage, the average penis can expand more and therefore exert more pressure on the whole cage. I have already broken two cages and have a spare one on hand if required. The CB6000S cage on the other hand seems to be more resistant to breakages given there is less opportunity for an erection so less force exerted on the cage. I have been wearing the shorted cage for much longer periods of time and no sign of seam failure yet.

Indeed, when I jokingly suggested she swallow (the key), the love of my life put her headphones on and pretended I wasn’t there. Pink Nylon Resin Chastity Cage, Mesh Design, Comfortable Chastity Cage, Plastic Sissy Chastity, Male Chastity Device, Penis Chastity, Pink Emmerdale spoilers: Aaron Dingle’s terrifying violent threat to Vinny as he issues dangerous demandCage: both cages are formed from two halves which are sonically welded together. Whilst this may be strong in most situations, the actual weld points are fairly small so any pressure exerted inside the cages is distributed over a smaller area where the joins are and has the potential to lead to the cage splitting. Both of the cages internal seams are really smooth and barely noticeable. The external seams where the spacer attaches are a little rough on both cages. I also noticed that where the opening is at the front of both cages, there is the possibility of a rough edge. This may need to be sanded ever so slightly.

The point here is that the Nano, like most devices, will retain some urine dribbles inside. That will necessitate proper and regular cleaning beyond the shower if you don’t want to walk around smelling of stale pee.Older models of chastity sheaths were difficult to wash and often uncomfortable; those made of plastic were fragile, representing significant risk to the wearer if they broke, and their closing mechanisms were often painful after several hours of use. I’ve found it easy to push the base ring away from my body a little and use my fingers to pull my soft peen out of the tube or cage with other devices. I attempted this with the Nano and was unable to do it. The chances of pulling out of this chastity device are slim unless you are determined to remove it. After wearing the Holy Trainer Nano V4 male chastity device for four days, I’m ready to render my verdict. The ergonomic base ring is comfortable and sits well against my body. The device feels solid and secure despite the welcome light weight. I slept comfortably wearing the Nano from the first night. According to Holy Trainer, the tube is designed to discourage nighttime erections. It isn’t something I have a problem with anyway, but I didn’t awake with any nocturnal erections while wearing the device.